Talk:Hanomag

Trucks Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Financial data - (PR / Copy vio ?)[edit]

This section on Financial data does not make sense :- " During the last fiscal year, the number of machines produced increased from 2500 to 3900. In the previous fiscal year, the turnover amounted to 356 million Euros, 62% over the year before. Komatsu Hanomag hired around 300 new employees during the last year; counting 268 temporary employees, around 1170 people were employed at Komatsu Hanomag at the end of last fiscal year. This is twice as many as at the end of the business year 2005, when around 650 people were employed here. "

This A) reads as if lifted from a company report (not cited) - probably Copyvio with bits like "last fiscal year" and B) It is unclear as to periods referred to as no clear base date given, other than the twice as ........year 2005 bit thus its several years old now.

So if some one wants to make sense of it so it has structure and references to be of encyclopedic value and not an abstract addition (corporate PR ?) feel free to add it back after sourcing and rewriting it.

- BulldozerD11 (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

picture gallery[edit]

i suggest to move the colour photos into a picture gallery. the way the photos are positioned now they clutter the right hand side of even big screens. M@ximili@n 21:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximilian Schönherr (talk • contribs)