Talk:Grade I listed buildings in Maidstone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listGrade I listed buildings in Maidstone is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on January 29, 2024.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2012Featured list candidatePromoted

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grade I listed buildings in Maidstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grade I listed buildings in Maidstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 June 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Grade I listed buildings in MaidstoneGrade I listed buildings in the Borough of Maidstone – This is a list of buildings in the Borough of Maidstone, which is more than just Maidstone. Some in Category:Lists of Grade I listed buildings in Kent use name of the articles, others with "(borough)" added but probably just because they weren't changed when the districts' articles were moved. Peter James (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Relisting. buidhe 23:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This list is older than all of the others. If you want a consistency in naming, the question should also be raised on the others in the category. None of the others are in the format Grade I listed buildings in the Borough of X. Three have "(borough)" after the name of the area, one has "(district)", one has "District" and seven have no qualifier. A consistency also should be kept with other articles for other county divisions where the name of the region is usually without a qualifier (e.g. Grade I listed buildings in Taunton Deane, Grade I listed buildings in Cheltenham, Grade I listed buildings in Craven, Grade I listed buildings in St Edmundsbury).--DavidCane (talk) 23:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.