Talk:Geordie dialect words

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 1 August 2022. The result of the discussion was retarget.

North East England High‑importance

	North East England portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Chaosdruid, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 23 March 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Capitals and MoS[edit]

The page has been marked for copyediting, but there are so many MOS problems regarding capitals it would seem like a ridiculous task to complete. I am marking it as not requiring copyediting at this time until someone de-capitalises it and sorts out any other formatting issues. Chaosdruid (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article might not be right for Wikipedia[edit]

Per WP:NOT#DICT, specifically #3, I think this article may need to be transwikied to Wikibooks. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 16:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE tasks[edit]

Done:
- fixed refrences from(*02) to a real references.
Currently:
- Correcting indentation for homophones.
Todo:
- Consitency.
- Capitalization.
- Example sentences.
- IPA

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Alanfromwakefield (talk) 10:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t understand what the problem is. It took me a considerable amount of time and energy to compile this article, even though I had produced the (albeit much smaller) “Spotter Book” earlier. There is (or was) nothing comparable on Wikipedia relating to the Geordie dialect, although there are similar articles for Cornish dialect words etc. which no-one seems to be wanting to delete.

The article was not copied from any other Wiki site (if they exist). Many, or in fact most, citations are given to actual antique books and records published in the 18th century.

A suggestion has been made that the contents have been transwikied (to Wiktionary or another project). Although I have not checked every word with Wiktionary, the vast majority which I have checked are not there. And I cannot find any other project, Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource etc.

Since compiling the “Geordie dialect words” article, I have also written some 300+ Wikipedia articles on the Geordie songs/songwriters/songbooks etc. all of which refer to, and many utilise, the article.

I appreciate that the article is lengthy (a bit too much so) and would appreciate any help and/or suggestion you could give in regards to splitting it alphabetically or otherwise, but cannot see any valid reason to delete the article.

The content has been imported to Wikibooks QU ^TalkQu 20:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]