This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
The article infers that the prayer was required, but it was actually optional. This should be clarified because there is a significant difference.
Do you have a citation? I doubt it was optional. Either way, the point is that it was written, led, and endorsed by the school officials - an establishment of religion which is explicitly disallowed in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 76.21.107.221 (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox states "Frankfurter and White took no part in the consideration or decision of the case." Does anyone have an idea why neither Frankfurter nor White was a part? The reasoning should be a part of the article, in my opinion, but not given undue weight. Bob305 (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
