Talk:Constituent Assembly of Cambodia

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia

Constituent Assembly of Cambodia is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

edit
history
watch
purge

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Norodom Sihanouk official 1955 portrait.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 August 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Speedy close – not moved, for the same reason as WP:SK#4. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 04:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodia Constituent Assembly → Constitution of Cambodia – Cambodia is currently one of the few countries without an article in Category:Constitutions by country. But an article about the constitution of Cambodia is already present in the English wikipedia, but is focused instead on the history of the writing of the Cambodian constitution. I propose to move this article and supplement it with information about the constitution itself. Waltermaid (talk) 07:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Adumbrativus (talk) 04:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. An new article on the "Constitution of Cambodia" should be able to stand by itself. There is no need to conflate the two articles. Make a new article on the "Constitution of Cambodia", where it can go into details about preambles, articles, etc. Leave the Constituent Assembly, which has its own worth as a historical event, as a separate article. Walrasiad (talk) 08:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I agree. It's strange that there is no article summarising the Cambodia constitution like there are for other countries. 103.4.65.37 (talk) 10:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.