Talk:Constantine (son of Basil I)

Constantine (son of Basil I) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 8, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
December 7, 2022	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
January 25, 2023	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Roman & Byzantine

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Roman and Byzantine emperors Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Roman and Byzantine Emperors WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Roman and Byzantine emperors. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roman and Byzantine emperorsWikipedia:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsTemplate:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsRoman and Byzantine emperors articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Constantine (son of Basil I)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ichthyovenator (talk · contribs) 11:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to give this one a look. Ichthyovenator (talk) 11:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Is there a reason for the difference in the "title" and "succession" fields in the infobox here compared to other junior emperors (i.e. Theophylact (son of Michael I), David (son of Heraclius), Constantine Doukas (co-emperor) - not that all of these are consistent either).
Done
Suggesting to add links to Basil I and Leo VI in the infobox
Done
Would it be possible to crop the infobox image? There is a lot of unnecessary blank space surrounding the coin.
I can take a look at it, but my image editing ability is near zero. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Went ahead and did it for you. Ichthyovenator (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the infobox it says he died "September 879", suggesting to add that it was 3 September.
Done
"Constantine (–3 September 879)", suggesting to either add the different speculated birth dates or change "–3 September 879" to "died 3 September 879"
Done
"whereas his younger brother, his younger brother Leo VI" - repetition
Done
Maybe this image of a coin with Constantine and his (step-)mom could be added to the Parentage section
Done
Maybe add the Template:Roman emperors at the bottom
Done
What does a "severe argument" mean? Is the argument so hotly debated that something like "Constantine's parentage is disputed" does not capture what's going on?

Only this one left. Ichthyovenator (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to "The parentage of Constantine is heavily disputed" as I feel it encapsulates how aggressive the disagreements are, while being more readable. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fair. Ichthyovenator (talk) 21:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "Dynasty" in "Macedonian Dynasty" should not be capitalized (it's capitalized both in the infobox and in the start of the second paragraph)
Done
The article is a bit convoluted since so little is known for certain but this isn't a problem since this reflects the sources. Interesting how there seems to be disagreements on pretty much every aspect of this man's life.
It really is incredible. I wonder how much clearer sources might have been if he had lived to take the throne; perhaps much more, perhaps much less. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Iazyges: I've finished going through the article. It's well-written and well-sourced - my points above are really minor details and nitpicks. Will pass the article once they have been addressed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 12:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ichthyovenator: That should be all; thank you for your review! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Iazyges: Yes! Article looks good, excellent work. Passing now. Ichthyovenator (talk) 21:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]