The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
the 2 pages Xinjiang papers China Cables should be merged ? P5EE5Eec5 (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing this out. I am not sure. I understand, that the 2 terms, though both referring to confidential Chinese government documents, definitely do not refer to the same documents, but two different troves of documents, i.e. the 2 terms cannot be used interchangeably. That is why I removed "or Xinjiang Papers" from the lede, which an editor had inserted, to avoid misunderstanding. The New York Times published the Xinjiang Papers on Nov 16 and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists ICIJ published the China Cables on Nov 24. The latter seems to provide more detail and be of larger scale. I am interested what others think--Wuerzele (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No,P5EE5Eec5. The 2 terms, though both referring to confidential Chinese government documents, do not refer to the same, but to two different publications, i.e. the 2 terms cannot be used interchangeably. The New York Times had published the Xinjiang Papers on Nov 16, 2019 and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists ICIJ and with it some 17 other associated largely European news agencies/ newspapers published the China Cables on Nov 24. The two entities do not even refer to each other´s publications. I have not seen the terms being used interchangeably. I recommend to remove the merge sign from the page, if there are no further opinions.--Wuerzele (talk) 06:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
