Talk:Black separatism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JosephHohLee. Peer reviewers: JosephHohLee.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"See also" section[edit]

My removal of an un-necessary section of unhelpful wikilinks was reverted without explanation. Far better, however, actually to improve this article by adding some reliable sources. I've tried to make a small start in that direction. --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 05:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The see also is for this! The "See also" section provides a bulleted list of internal links to related Wikipedia articles. A reasonable number of relevant links that would be in a hypothetical "perfect article" are suitable to add to the "See also" section. These are the counterpart to each subject. J. D. Redding 12:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"These are the counterpart to each subject"?! This makes no sense at all. --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 19:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please expand the article it is woefully short.

Black separatism is related to racism and the other topics in the see also. Ex. White nationalism and black nationalism. Seperatist nationalist crop up in the population of white people and black people.

Sincerely, J. D. Redding 12:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that the President believes in this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.78.81.151 (talk) 00:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Safe spaces?[edit]

Aren't the calls for black safe spaces on e.g. college campuses a form of black separatism/race segregation? 11:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)78.42.255.27 (talk) 11:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yes they are. What's your point? 123.3.246.218 (talk) 08:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why so few people named in this article?[edit]

It's odd that only three people are associated with supporting the concepts of Black Separatism outlined in this article, particularly when it is divided into the multiple separate concepts of cultural, religious, political, economic, and territorial segments. Obviously some of these have tremendous momentum and many readily identified supporters.

For instance many conversations in the media have taken place over the inappropriate nature of "cultural appropriation" of things like White Australian rappers (Iggy Azalia), essentially people who oppose this sort of thing are Black Cultural Separatists.

A missing category are "genetic separatists" who oppose race-mixing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.76.12 (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone incorporate the SPLC section on black separatism?[edit]

Here's the link. Fluous (talk) 04:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Purest form"[edit]

What makes national separatism more pure than cultural separatism? Pure is the complete wrong word for that. It's just a nationalist form of it 123.3.246.218 (talk) 09:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]