Talk:Bangsamoro peace process

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Use of the acronym "GPH"[edit]

The use of the acronym "GPH" is highly unusual except in MNLF literature. The linked pages do not have GPH in them, but the link titles are labelled with GPH. This is a possibly propagandic use of acronyms to make both the MNLF and GPH appear to be the same kind of thing when they are not.

The Philippines is almost always referred to as either "The Philippines" or "The Republic of the Philippines" anywhere else. If abbreviated, it is usually abbreviated as RP (Replublic of the Philippines). I suggest replacing frivolous usage of GPH with either "The Philippine Government" or as RP if an acronym is necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.18.220.192 (talk) 22:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

>> Philippines agrees peace with Muslim rebels>> Philippine peace deal worries locals>> v Philippines launches offensive against rebels>> Philippines army kills Muslim rebel holdouts(Lihaas (talk) 12:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

References[edit]

Refs need to be within the tags not as outside links(Lihaas (talk) 16:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ThaddeusB (talk) 02:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A better name? Mindanao peace process?[edit]

Is this name sufficiently common enough to meet WP:CommonName? I don't think that it is. Mindanao peace process I think would fit better. It is certainly used by newspapers worldwide (e.g. the Philippine Daily Inquirer [1] who uses the tag "Mindanao peace process", and the Guardian of London [2]). The Philippine government has used the phrase.[3]

Certainly "in the Philippines" can be dropped since no other countries have a peace process with the Bangsamoro.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 03:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Bangsamoro peace process[edit]

We have two articles for exactly the same thing! Charles Essie (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with the merge proposal. "Peace process with the Bangsamoro in the Philippines" refers the overall efforts of the Philippine government to resovle the Moro conflict through peaceful means with all groups involved. "Bangsamoro peace process" (Which I reverted back to "Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro" refers to the specific preliminary peace agreement between the Philippine government and the Moro Islamic Front (MILF). "Peace process with the Bangsamoro in the Philippines" includes not just the MILF but the Moro National Liberation Front, and other moro groups.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:47, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed Charles Essie (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 May 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. SSTflyer 10:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peace process with the Bangsamoro in the Philippines → Bangsamoro peace process – The current title is needlessly long. This is shorter and more straightforward. Mindanao peace process (as mentioned above) and Moro peace process would also work. Charles Essie (talk) 15:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - "Bangsamoro peace process" is a plausible shorter term. The current title is a mouthful while a shorter article name could be used.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support seems that other peace process articles follow the same naming system --Lenticel (talk) 01:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support since it's the more common turn of phrase anyway.- Alternativity (talk) 01:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bangsamoro peace process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bangsamoro_peace_process&oldid=1205698072"