Talk:Asher Vollmer/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rhain1999 (talk · contribs) 01:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
"he was found himself playing with the arrow keys" - "was" appears to be a typo.
You could add the year of release after the mention of some games (for example, "Drop7 (2009)"), though I'll leave this up to you.
"Vollmer unveiled Close Castles in 2014." Is it possible to include the month of the unveiling?

Some very minor grammar/punctuation concerns (two of which are simply requests, not even requirements). It's great to see other articles about game developers nominated for GA (I've recently embarked on a similar project). I'll leave this on hold until I receive a reply, but it shouldn't be long before this is passed. Really great work on this. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me | current FLC) 01:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhain1999, thanks! I made the changes, if you'll take a look. – czar 01:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for addressing those concerns so quickly. Everything looks good to me! Here you go: . -- Rhain1999 (talk to me | current FLC) 02:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]