Talk:Arthur Spatt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First in US federal criminal trial[edit]

This article is a stub, and needs to be expanded. Fortunately, Spatt's slavery ruling, is the first in US federal criminal trial regarding double damages, applicable only to civil cases, aside from its very first to imprison bid fishes.--Florentino floro (talk) 08:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think some more general information about the judge himself would be helpful. One ruling on a case doesn't really tell us about Spatt. maxsch (talk) 15:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Before I added this important on jurists contain a) some notable opinions and b) landmark cases handled, inter alia. See: Conchita Carpio-Morales[1];John G. Roberts

[2], and former UK Deputy high court Judge David Pannick. I could have just put this Spatt decision down as Some notable opinions. But, it is rather a first one, and this is a mere stub, so empty and just starting. So, I decided to add just very short edit on this, to expand this article, as suggested by the stub, leaving to the readers, the opening of links, if they desire further info.--Florentino floro (talk) 05:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot-created subpage[edit]

A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Arthur Donald Spatt was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 21:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]