Talk:AppNexus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

Cloud computing and infrastructure as a service are recent growing phenomenons in need of documentation. AppNexus is especially notable as it has Fortune 500 clients, something unusual in the cloud computing industry, which has generally catered to small companies and startups.

Give us sources then! I can't take your word for it at face value. I need a few articles as evidence. If you can come up with it, great. If you can't, then you have not proven this page's notability. Generally, if this company is notable, some other people (not you) will be creating this page. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 23:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure about the notability - a quick google search returned a page of mostly WP:SPS but we've gone 18 months since this interaction without the issue being fixed so I'm just going to add a {{notability}} template and hopefully someone passing by will fix it. -- samj inout 01:01, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on AppNexus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AppNexus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation of "usage of the past tense" changes[edit]

The purchase by AT&T seems to be over and "done", now. (It's "past tense".)[edit]

Note that the purchase by AT&T seems to be now a "fait accompli", that is, something that has already happened, and is no longer "in progress". (See, e.g., this article https://adexchanger.com/platforms/appnexus-is-no-longer-independent-how-will-its-clients-react/ << "AppNexus Is No Longer Independent: How Will Its Clients React?" >> dated Tuesday, June 26th, 2018 – 9:37 am).

The last sentence of the edit comment for this edit, says:

Perhaps the words "Before the purchase by AT&T," should ["also"] be added at the beginning of this sentence!)

IMHO that would be a good idea; but maybe we should first see whether anyone else has any opinions to share. (A suggestion here "might" get more attention than the last sentence of an edit comment).

Also, in view of the "past tense" nature of the purchase by AT&T, IMHO the sentence that now says:

On June 18, 2018, news outlets reported that AT&T is in talks to acquire the company.

should be updated to say was ("was in talks") instead of is ("is in talks").

Any comments?[edit]

--Mike Schwartz (talk) 23:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]