Talk:Alpha and beta male

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alpha and beta male article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

edit
history
watch
purge

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Gender studies Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Domestic violence in lesbian relationships · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Men's Issues Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Farrell, Tracie; Fernandez, Miriam; Novotny, Jakub; Alani, Harith (June 2019). "Exploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit" (PDF). WebSci ’19: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science: 87–96. doi:10.1145/3292522.3326045. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 April 2022.
Han, Xiaoting; Yin, Chenjun (2022). "Mapping the manosphere. Categorization of reactionary masculinity discourses in digital environment". Feminist Media Studies. doi:10.1080/14680777.2021.1998185. ISSN 1468-0777.

hol up[edit]

If alpha and beta males pseudoscientific terms, then why are we animals? Darbymarby (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It started as a term to describe wolves, but has since been discredited as term to apply to animal behavior. See Dominance hierarchy--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 03:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly, with wolves there are still alphas in unrelated groups, as well as among primates. 82.149.149.48 (talk) 12:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Type A and Type B personalities[edit]

I'd suggest adding this link to the "See Also" section at the bottom, but I can't because the page can't be edited by me since i"m not an alpha male Wikipedia editor like some folks:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_A_and_Type_B_personality_theory

The letters even match, A and B, alpha and beta. Surely there are some sociological similarities between these categorizations...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9190:74C0:79CF:13EE:5291:37BC (talk) 01:58, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Gamma is the third letter of the Greek alphabet and delta is the fourth, so the terms should be swapped around accordingly. 108.160.120.91 (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed this sentence entirely, as it was cited to an unreliable source. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Pseudoscientific?"[edit]

I think the term "pseudoscientific" may very well have been used unneutrally in the lead. Like the unsigned user under the topic "Type A and Type B personalities" on this talk page said, alpha and beta ties into the Type A and B personality types hypothesis quite closely (many use the terms interchangeably), and the subject is rather contentious politically and ideologically speaking, so an editor might've put pseudoscientific there under emotional influence. Pie GGuy (talk) 23:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is cited in the article body. See MOS:LEAD. Article talk pages are not an appropriate place to speculate about the imagined motivations of other editors (per WP:TALKNO). Generalrelative (talk) 23:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opening Sentence[edit]

I noticed that "pseudoscientific" got removed from the lead again, which is fair actually, give that I couldn't find many sources specifically referring to it as that. However, there are many sources saying that it is a scientifically inaccurate concept, and I don't know the best way to convey that in the lead. Thoughts? 22090912l (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for opening this discussion. I've restored the term for now, since the rationales for removal weren't based in policy. Though not all reliable sources use the term "pseudoscience" here, plenty do, and the scientific consensus is clearly that the terms are misleading when applied to humans. Generalrelative (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]