Talk:Aleksandar Vučić

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RfC: Infobox image[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Which image should be used in the infobox? The A one is of Vučić in 2019, while B is of him in 2022. I am personally for image B, as it is more recent and I believe that enough time has gone by for a new image to be added. --Bakir123 (talk) 11:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd rather keep the current image (A), considering that his appearance has not changed that much since 2019. But between the 2022 photos, C looks better than B. --Vacant0 (talk) 11:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd go for option B, more recent and good quality image. Elserbio00 (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • There has been a previous RfC on this and while the alternate images may have changed the arguments for (A) being preferred are still the same. It has better framing, good use of contrast and good ratio of the subject to background. (A) is the superior image. AlanStalk 12:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Option A. His appearance hasn't changed at all since 2019. After all, WP:AINTBROKE. Festucalextalk 13:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC) (Summoned by bot)[reply]
  • A is just a much better photo.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  14:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC) PS: I would go with C as a second choice, if "A" is thought to be too old a photo (too young-looking). The "B" picture is really unflattering.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  00:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • A might well be the better image - but I think he looks noticeably younger in it. Seems more jowly now, skin doesn't look as young, and greyer hair. I'd go with B as I think it's better than C. Nfitz (talk) 21:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, I guess that's a reasonable point.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  00:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • A - B & C are worse. Alexcs114 :) 17:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 31 August 2023[edit]

185.169.248.106 (talk) 07:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protect legally criminal personally is a amoral act!!!

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Vacant0 (talk) 08:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 1 October 2023[edit]

Please change "president of Serbia" to "President of Serbia". /in the lede/ It is same as function-naming convention for United States politicians. --5.43.76.184 (talk); 17:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [e][reply]

 Not done: The current style follows the Manual of Style. Vacant0 (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2024[edit]

Should we add dates per short description as "President of Serbia since 2017"? 200.24.153.151 (talk) 14:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]