Talk:275 Madison Avenue

275 Madison Avenue has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 3, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 275 Madison Avenue appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the architect of 275 Madison Avenue did not include much exterior decoration because he wanted the building to be "shadow-less"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/275 Madison Avenue.

Wikipedia

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted without image by Theleekycauldron (talk) 00:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

275 Madison Avenue

... that the architect of 275 Madison Avenue (pictured) didn't include much exterior decoration because he wanted the building to be "shadow-less"? Source: "New Skyscraper in Central Zone; New East Side Skyscraper" (PDF). The New York Times. December 21, 1930. p. 141.
- ALT1:... that 275 Madison Avenue (pictured) used color contrasts for decoration because the architect wanted the building to be "shadow-less"? Source: "505-Foot-High Tower Of Black and White For Madison Avenue: Windows Will Be Flush With Facade Which Is Intended to Provide Minimum Light". New York Herald Tribune. July 20, 1930. p. E2.
- ALT2:... that a foreclosure proceeding for 275 Madison Avenue (pictured) was overturned because the company that started the foreclosure process only owned 2 percent of the building? Source: "Clarifies Status of Mortgagees; Justice Frankenthaler Rules 2% Interest Not Enough to Bring Foreclosure" (PDF). The New York Times. December 13, 1933. p. 37

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Gunilla Kreiss

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 15:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

– The article is new enough (created on August 14, 2021) and long enough (24,622 characters), cites various sources, and is free of plagiarism (Earwig's copyvio detector detects at-most 16.7% similarity – violation unlikely). The hooks are less than 200 characters, formatted properly, and are definitely interesting. The image is licenced properly, used in the article and looks fine in 100px. Just waiting for a QPQ to proceed. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: Thanks for the review, I really appreciate it. I've done a QPQ now. Epicgenius (talk) 16:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– QPQ provided. I couldn't access the sources, but assuming good faith, the nomination is approved. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P5 without image