Talk:Albertine Lapensée

Albertine Lapensée has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 22, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Women in Red: Women's organizations & conferences (2017)

This article was created or improved during the Women's organizations & conferences edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in May 2017. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Canada: Ontario / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Women's sport: Ice hockey High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's ice hockey task force.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Albertine Lapensée appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 May 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Albertine Lapensée, described as Canada's first female ice hockey "superstar", was dogged by accusations of being a man?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albertine Lapensée.

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Albertine Lapensée/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bill McKenna (talk · contribs) 00:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As 8 days have passed from my review without further comment, I have set this article to GA status. Congratulations to all contributors. Bill McKenna (talk) 03:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article meets all GA criteria - Pass

This article meets Good Article standards as follows:

Criterion 1: The article is well written. It is clear and concise, and my review could find no grammar problems.

It would be nice if the contents of the 'Later Life' section were less repetitive from the second paragraph of the introduction section. This recommendation would be a slight improvement, and the article still meets the criteria without addressing this point.
- Hmmm, I see what you mean. I'll see what I can do. Harrias ^talk 07:57, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion 2: The article is verifiable. The sources document the subject well, and there are several reliable second sources.

Is credit due to wikipedia.fr? I have read the article in the French language wikipedia, and there are similarities. Please recheck and verify that it is either not substantially sourced from .fr, or add the appropriate credit.Help:Interlanguage links
- I have not read the French language article, so any overlap is entirely coincidental. More likely it is because both are based on the same original sources. Harrias ^talk 07:57, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion 3: The article is broad in its coverage. As stated above, the writing style is concise, with complete coverage of Albertine Lapensée. Of course, the fact that she dropped from sight in ~1918 is frustrating, but that has nothing to do with the article itself. In fact, the article gives good coverage of her 'disappearance'.

Criterion 4: The article is neutral, both by its tone and the article contents.

Criterion 5: The article is stable. It is a new article, but it is unlikely to have excessive edits, and I cannot imagine an edit war over it.

Criterion 6: The article has a fascinating picture of Albertine Lapensée. As per the .fr issue outlined in #2, the pic also appears in the French article. I rather think that it was taken from the Women in Red Sports event as an allowable Wikimedia item. There is nothing that indicates a fair usage problem though.