Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.

You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

Click here to add a new section

Shortcuts

WP:BN
WP:BNB

The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

Crat tasks
RfAs	0
RfBs	0
Overdue RfBs	0
Overdue RfAs	0
BRFAs	13
Approved BRFAs	0

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

It is 18:38:32 on May 16, 2024, according to the server's time and date.

Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2022#March 2022

The following inactive administrators are being desysoped due to inactivity. Thank you for your service.

Sabine's Sunbird (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Last admin action: February 2019
Wassupwestcoast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Last admin action: September 2009
Ryan Postlethwaite (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Last admin action: March 2019

— xaosflux ^Talk 01:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, Ryan Postlethwaite, now there's a big name from the past. SilkTork (talk) 04:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Every few months a name pops up in this notification that makes me wish we had a Wikipedia version of "Where are they Now"?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same, haven't seen Ryan's name around much over the last 5 or so years. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think he nominated for admin a good number of the current 'Crats. He didn't nominate me, but he did support my RfA. SilkTork (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan co-nominated me for admin, and both supported and opposed my RfB.Ryan Postlethwaite, if you're reading this ygm and thank you for many years of wisdom and excellent, thoughtful, kind-hearted contributions. --Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 11:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan supported my second and successful run for adminship. As for Ponyo's suggestion; About a decade ago the WMF did a survey of former editors, it should be possible to try something similar for former admins, most of them seem to have an email set at the time of their desysop. It would be good to know what proprtion are just busy and might return in future decades. As for those who left because of particular on Wiki incidents, one wonders how many have checked to see if the concern they had at the time has been vindicated. Ϣere SpielChequers 11:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's only a handful of Ryan's noms at User:Gmaxwell/adminship map; he'd look much more impressive if anyone would complete the map. —Kusma (talk) 12:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found this: User:Ryan_Postlethwaite/Adminship. SilkTork (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That adminship map is fascinating! I almost spit out my morning tea when I found my own name and learned that Runcorn was my great-grand-nominator... bibliomaniac 1 5 17:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It made me do my own map and I discovered HJ Mitchell nominated one of his own nominators so he's both my grandnominator and great-great-grand nominator. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm my own grandnominator? ^{SubjectiveNotability} _{a GN franchise} (talk to the boss) 19:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just compiled my tree and there are some big names in it! Angela (self-nom) → Michael Snow → Fredrik → gadfium → Grutness → me. Thryduulf (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a "big name"? But there's only eight letters in it! :) Ryan's inactive to the point of desysopping? That's sad. I recall Sabine's Sunbird being a busy admin back in the day too. Grutness...wha? 00:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just found I'm only two degrees of separation from Ryan, who nominated Pedro, who nominated me. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guess that makes Runcorn my great-great-grand-nominator. Useight (talk) 19:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like that data only goes to late 2007 and has gaps as well. My own chain of grand noms goes back into 2003 and includes people who passed RFA with 1,150 and 300 edits. Ϣere SpielChequers 21:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link or it didn't happen. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've got me -> Kudpung -> HJ Mitchell -> Fastily (self nom) - only goes back to 2009. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My map goes back to Ryan as well via Dweller as well as The Rambling Man but that branch of the adminship family tree loops there because Dweller nommed TRM :'-D (me => Dweller => Ryan Postlethwaite => Majorly). Regards So Why 11:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request Re-Sysop (Ad Orientem)

Ad Orientem (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb)}

24 hr hold is understood. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last desysop was in September 2020 (request here), and was done voluntarily without a cloud. Ad Orientem has also been very active recently, so no concerns there. Besides the standard hold we should be clear to resysop. bibliomaniac 1 5 06:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last sysop action September 2020, seems fine after standard 24hr hold. Welcome back. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No objections from me. Respected admin who stressed out and needed a break. Welcome back. SilkTork (talk) 16:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]