Talk:Mao Zedong
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mao Zedong article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suggest adding Mao Zedong's courtesy name Runzhi to the first sentence of the article, immediately following his name. Xiliman (talk) 07:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Pinchme123 (talk) 05:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Irrelevant section with unreliable source?[edit]
"Despite being considered a feminist figure by some [by whom?] and a supporter of women's rights, documents released by the US Department of State in 2008 show that Mao declared women to be a "nonsense" in 1973 ... "
This paragraph seems irrelevant to the Cultural Revolution section because there's no mention that Mao heavily promoted feminism in China during this time, besides in the main article on the Cultural Revolution.
Also the US DoS is an unreliable source.
The paragraph should either be better incorporated, moved to a later section, or removed entirely. Quinton-Ashley (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- It is not sourced to the US DoD. Slatersteven (talk) 16:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, not directly but the news channels that printed the story cite the US DoS released documents (Henry Kissinger) as their only source. Seemingly there's no other source that could corroborate the story so it seems hard to prove or disapprove, yet it is stated as fact. It should instead use phrasing like "According to the US Department of State, Mao said ... ". Quinton-Ashley (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not so troubled by the State Department issue, as this is attributed. However, the first two links are broken and the first part of the paragraph is SYNTH in that it draws a contrast not made by the sole remaining source (i.e. "Despite" being a feminist politically, Mao said some lousy things about women to Kissinger...). This may also raise on UNDUE issue. I'll make at least an initial edit on this point. JArthur1984 (talk) 03:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, not directly but the news channels that printed the story cite the US DoS released documents (Henry Kissinger) as their only source. Seemingly there's no other source that could corroborate the story so it seems hard to prove or disapprove, yet it is stated as fact. It should instead use phrasing like "According to the US Department of State, Mao said ... ". Quinton-Ashley (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Not for nothing but the first edits on the page were in American English. Was there a discussion about why Mao had notably closer ties to the United Kingdom somewhere in the textwall archives? or is this something we should remove from the talk page banners and fix when someone has a mind to? — LlywelynII 12:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- English was the sole official language of Hong Kong until 1978, and remains an official language in Hong Kong — a territory ceded directly to China by the UK only a few decades ago.
- Unsurprisingly, HK English is far closer to the English spoken in England than the English spoken in America. Foxmilder (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Wrong age of Luo Yixiu[edit]
The article states: Luo was locally disgraced and died in 1910 at 21 years old.
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luo_Yixiu, she was 20 when she died (if you take a look at her birth and death dates).
I can't change it due to page protection, but maybe someone else can. ––TobbiM (talk) 17:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed.--Jack Upland (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
IPA Pronunciation[edit]
Please add the IPA pronunciation of this man's name. Is his first name said the same as the bird mao? 1.126.109.198 (talk) 13:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect year on Mao's infobox portrait?[edit]
The caption reads "Mao in 1959" but the image on Wikimedia Commons says "Mao Zedong 1963", so which year is it? 1959 or 1963? If 1959 is incorrect, please switch it over to 1963, and vice-versa if 1963 is incorrect. HelloTHERE123456 (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in People
- B-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (military) articles
- High-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Top-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- B-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class China-related articles
- Top-importance China-related articles
- B-Class China-related articles of Top-importance
- B-Class Chinese history articles
- Top-importance Chinese history articles
- WikiProject Chinese history articles
- WikiProject China articles
- B-Class Asia articles
- Mid-importance Asia articles
- WikiProject Asia articles
- B-Class Death articles
- High-importance Death articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class philosopher articles
- Mid-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- B-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Mid-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- B-Class Eastern philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Eastern philosophy articles
- Eastern philosophy task force articles
- B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- B-Class Atheism articles
- Mid-importance Atheism articles
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class socialism articles
- Top-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics