Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Requests for page protection | |
---|---|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits to this page are vandalism or reverted vandalism. Pksois23 (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 11:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FoxtAl (talk) 11:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- This IP user [1] is removing |this content, which is clearly stated in | this source. Repeating the behaviour after giving multiple warnings by me - [2], [3] and another admin [4] regarding the same edit. This IP user is a habitual Vandalizer, he got warnings on other article as well [5] FoxtAl (talk) 11:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- You changed the wording from:
- "in development by Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) and sub-contractor BAE Systems"
- to
- "developed between Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) and UK's BAE Systems"
- How is that from the entire source, what you brought to Wiki was just "developed between"? How is this an improvement for you to edit war over?
- It's a bad faith edit to make it look like it is a joint venture, which it isn't. You also removed the specific "sub-contractor" wording for no reason as well which is what BAE systems is in this case. You also pretended that previous sources didn't count and your change may very well fall under no original research. 88.230.170.214 (talk) 11:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- You should've checked the inline citation, [6] which explicitly states that "The Kaan was developed between Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) and Britain’s BAE Systems, as part of a $125 million (£100 million) deal signed in 2017." FoxtAl (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- $125 million contract is nothing when it comes to developing a 5th gen fighter whose cost is in tens of billions. It is the project of Turkish Aerospace Industries. It's not a project of BAE nor they have any rights over it.
- BAE is not a bigger partner than TRMotor which is building the engine, Aselsan which makes its radars, Roketsan which makes its armament and many other companies. 88.230.170.214 (talk) 12:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- You should've checked the inline citation, [6] which explicitly states that "The Kaan was developed between Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) and Britain’s BAE Systems, as part of a $125 million (£100 million) deal signed in 2017." FoxtAl (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- This IP user is editwarring as well and seems to broke 3RR rule as well. Diffs - [7], [8], [9], [10] - but there's no editwar warning in his talk. FoxtAl (talk) 11:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This account (Disansee) in Vietnamese Wikipedia was banned and started attacking me. Pminh141 (talk) 13:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined This can't be solved via protection; try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, as we are dealing with one account. I have used different translation programs, but translations from Vietnamese aren't always conclusive. Lectonar (talk) 15:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism instances, possible LTA. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. The page was indefinitely semi-protected previously, but the protection was reasonably lifted in response to a reasonable WP:RFPD request. Unfortunately, it seems like the semi-protection was necessary. @Ganesha811: Please let me know if you have any objections. I considered pending changes, but I don't see any redeeming edits from non-autoconfirmed editors. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- No objections, I've been watching the page and was considering re-protecting myself. I assume the issue is that children may put 'game' into Wikipedia's search engine and stumble across the page at high rates, in addition to being generally high-profile. —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Again POV-pushing without serious discussion. The Banner talk 14:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If the dispute crosses over into edit warring, I would recommend using WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued re-insertion of unverified and trivial content ("Notable" according to whom?, for instance. Drmies (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try pending changes. We can extend or increase later if needed. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated hijack of disambiguation page with unsourced bio, by two similarly named accounts and an IP. Wikishovel (talk) 15:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: For no vandalism Trollers739 (talk) 16:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Stoping hoax information. Myrabert01 (talk) 16:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: So that no one changes it and preserve history Trollers739 (talk) 16:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – One user keeps moving this page without consensus and despite being asked to use RM. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The three month pending changes protection was helping, but the level and duration of disruption is sufficient to justify semi-protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Full protection to avoid cut and paste moves to here. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Being vandalised by cult following of Aaron Smith-Levin, one of Mike Rinder's detractors. Evidence on talk page isn't stopping the vandalism. This is related to the controversial topic "Scientology". Page was semi-protected on Feb 11 for one month. Has been re-vandalised in the same manner 3 times since protection lifted just 8 days ago. @Johnuniq: You requested to be notified in the problems continues. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 17:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edit by IPs. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Requesting full protection due to continued addition of birth name and GENSEX violations not solved by current level. GnocchiFan (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Full protection? Come on. This could be solved by blocking those who deadname. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonsense IP edit vandalism. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Joyous! Noise! 20:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent Vandalism Pepper Gaming (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping anon that keeps adding a Mary Poppins entry, but navboxes are for existing articles. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: It appears that at least 2 unregistered users and 1 registered user (one of which has been blocked from editing) continue to vandalize the page with un-cited edits. Sharpgirl22 (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: As usual, multiple violations of WP:SPORTSTRANS by IPs and non-EC users. The Kip 21:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep (talk) 21:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Nthep:
Did you accidentally paste a previous response into this request as well as the others? This looks like the only page that you protected.(By the way, pending changes does not seem to be very effective for problems due to unsourced changes because PC reviewers sometimes approve unsourced edits because they aren't blatant vandalism. It looks like several edits were approved prematurely.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)- These are shenanigans by an IP, altering/forging Nthep's messages. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz: Thanks, I looked at this article first, which Nthep actually protected... Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- These are shenanigans by an IP, altering/forging Nthep's messages. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Nthep:
Reason: Death hoaxes 173.76.229.247 (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nthep (talk) 21:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 173.76.229.247 (talk) 21:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Nthep (talk) 21:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please also make sure that you either RevDel and/or suppress all of his edits that he made on my user talk page as well. kleshkreikne. T 22:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the persistant vandalism involves RevDel, I'll go ahead and pp it. Q T C 22:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent spamming. Two users keep adding personal threats/spamming Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 22:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I've already reported it. Thank you. kleshkreikne. T 22:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Already done. Q T C 22:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Kleshkreikne Sorry, did not appear whilst I was editing. All good. Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 23:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 22:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content (episode writers; air dates), now even ignoring inline comments that sources are required. Dorsetonian (talk) 23:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Not certain, but IP may be adding false info. GoodDay (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 01:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. BLP / constant addition of unsourced data (notably DOB) Synorem (talk) 02:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Continued factual error/NPOV inputs from Indian IPs after protection expired. Synorem (talk) 02:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: There is a group of pages that a series of IPs continue to make the same disruptive edits on. It's incessant. Anwegmann (talk) 02:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Same reason as above. This is another article in the group currently under attack by a series of IPs making the same disruptive edits. Anwegmann (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: And here is another of the group. Anwegmann (talk) 02:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: And another under attack by the series of IPs. Anwegmann (talk) 02:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by possible Albert20009 sock. ViperSnake151 Talk 03:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by possible Albert20009 sock. ViperSnake151 Talk 03:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated edits by users citing negative opinion pieces to include criticism of Galante as if it were fact. Galante's career credentials are repeatedly removed and have to be repeatedly reinstated. Blogs by uncredentialed outlets criticizing Galante have been cited as the basis for erroneous, borderline slanderous claims rising near to the level of vandalism.
In summary, this article should be protected because it's the biography of a controversial person which is repeatedly edited to adopt a more negative tone, sometimes against established fact and Wikipedia's own policies. Ravenandadove (talk) 03:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)