User talk:Aseleste

Navigation

Further information: Help:Navigation

Quick access

• Talk archives

• Welcome!
• The Wikipedia Adventure

Subpages

Further information: Wikipedia:Subpages

Subpages of User talk:Aseleste (Mobile)

• Talk archives
• Editnotice
• Sandbox
• The Wikipedia Adventure
• The Wikipedia Adventure/Earth

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021

• Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection

• In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades

• Opinion: Wikipedia's war against scientific disinformation

• In the media: The world's press says "Happy Birthday!" with a few twists

• Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically

• Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years

• News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world

• Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers

• Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia

• Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020

• Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

– Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 04:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

WP:U1 applicability to user talk pages in special conditions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Is WP:U1 applicable to user talk pages in some special conditions?

I want to delete User talk:Aseleste/Archives and subpages that is in the form of Aseleste/Archives/20XX/XX. The pages are created as a result of a move that moves User talk:Aseleste/Archives and its subpages to User talk:Aseleste/Talk archives.

Normally, WP:U1 would not apply. However, all the pages above does not seem to be linked elsewhere, and the talk page history is not in the pages above already, so I am wondering whether WP:U1 is applicable.

If not, should I raise this on WP:MfD? – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 06:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Your user talk page is special and will not normally be deleted. You have rather broad control, however, over the contents of your user talk page and can delete any content there with just a few exceptions (such as outstanding unblock declines).

Similarly, you have control over the subpages of your user talk page, including archives, and should be able to delete or re-arrange them as you see fit. An admin will almost certainly honor a U1 request for any unwanted user talk subpages, especially redirects left over from moves. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Alright, thank you. – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 08:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

– Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 06:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Postal Regulatory Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watchdog. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

– Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 13:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Script error

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please note that your script destroyed a reference here. Regards. --Muhandes (talk) 10:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I should have read {{Certification Table Entry}}. I see you have fixed it the right way in this diff, so thank you.

However, just to be clear, that specific change is made manually through the interface of WPCleaner instead of automatically by the program itself. – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 12:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Good to know that it is not the script. Oddly, you are the second person to use a script and do this same mistake, so I thought it was script related. Happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 11:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Rollback

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi Aseleste. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 21:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 13:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 13:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
487		Goodison Park (talk)	Add sources
2,590		Nottingham Forest F.C. (talk)	Add sources
428		Children of General Hospital (talk)	Add sources
168		Homo sacer (talk)	Add sources
18		Hardy/Webber family (talk)	Add sources
922		Morecambe (talk)	Add sources
590		Elland Road (talk)	Cleanup
44		Science diplomacy (talk)	Cleanup
46		Mac Scorpio (talk)	Cleanup
18		Jennifer Smith (General Hospital) (talk)	Expand
72		Morgan Corinthos (talk)	Expand
51		Neanderthals in Gibraltar (talk)	Expand
111		Jasper Jacks (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
951		Battle of Sinhagad (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
239		Electrolytic cell (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
44		Semi-basement (talk)	Merge
206		Mixed-orientation marriage (talk)	Merge
912		Electroplating (talk)	Merge
1,278		AJ McLean (talk)	Wikify
54		History of General Hospital (talk)	Wikify
75		Gopikabai (talk)	Wikify
9		Foreign espionage in New Zealand (talk)	Orphan
4		Ilona Katliarenka (talk)	Orphan
3		Bracka Street, Kraków (talk)	Orphan
4		New St. Michael's Cave (talk)	Stub
10		African Diplomatic Corps (talk)	Stub
2		Marble Arch Cave (Gibraltar) (talk)	Stub
4		Goat's Hair Twin Caves (talk)	Stub
39		Foot-lambert (talk)	Stub
3		Poca Roca Cave (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 14:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks ...

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

... for the revert. 165.1.194.41 (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Is this supposed to be sarcastic? To me, it could go both ways :). Anyway, please state your problem. ~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 17:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

100% serious. I thought it was a typo and missed the legend at the top of the page. But you're right, my comment here was ambiguous. So thanks for reaching out (again, not sarcastiv).

And you adding the edit comment also helped.

Problem statement: None.

Cheers, 165.1.194.41 (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome. 🙂 ~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 13:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 13:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Karen Lewis (labor leader)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

On 9 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Karen Lewis (labor leader), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 05:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~ Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 13:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Triggering a notification

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I am using the doppelganger account to post something here so that I can take a screenshot of being notified of having a new message. Please do not take this as an attempt at Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry, thank you. Ase1este (talk) 05:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aseleste (talk • contribs) 2021-02-09T21:52:05 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Chip.berlet (talk) 15:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

@Chip.berlet: Can I trout you back for not filling in YOUR REASON HERE? Anyway, what's the matter? ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 15:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

I was making changes to the page on the "Source Publishing Collective" page when it was deleted without notice. My changes were to coply with complaints and suggestions by other Wikipedia editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chip.berlet (talk • contribs) 2021-02-12T15:53:13 (UTC)

@Chip.berlet: I am slightly sorry. I have a suggestion though, you can avoid this from happening next time by creating the article in the Draft: namespace first, and then move it yourself after you are sure that nobody will object to it as you are probably autoconfirmed. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 16:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Chip Berlet - Trout Fishing on Wikipedia

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Working on a new page for a pre-WWW publishing group called "Source Collective"

Hello,

I am going to create a non-wiki page online with images of the covers of the "Source Catalogs" which were organizing handbooks for progressive activists published in paperback form in the 1970s. . I am trapped in a Catch 22. These resource handbooks were printed in the Pre-WWW days. They are held in the collection of the Library of Congress and numerous other libraries. I can link to a list of libraries in the US that have one or more of the printed copies. . Sigh.... . So thanks, but for now I have permission from all the living members of the Source Catalog publishing collective to post the books online. . p.s. I attract Wiki Trolls and have been dragged before ARBCOM many times because wiki-critics object to my status as a well-published progressive author. In all cases I have had my status as an active Wikipedia editor restored. Please note that I have cordially co-edited a Wikipedia page on neonazism with a self-proclaimed neonazi Wikipedia editor, and nonetheless we managed to produce a useful page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chip_Berlet

https://independent.academia.edu/ChipBerlet

Best wishes,

Chip Berlet — Preceding undated comment added 2021-02-12T17:22:04‎

@Chip.berlet: Actually, have you checked out Draft:Source Catalogs? The page was not deleted, it was simply moved to Draft:Source Catalogs. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 17:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

GDP nominal of Kolkata is actually 170-180 billion $ according to Statistical institute of India. But an foreign user is always editing and reducing it... please block him

GDP nominal of Kolkata is actually 170-180 billion $ according to Statistical institute of India. But an foreign user is always editing and reducing it... please block him Polling 2 (talk) 04:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss on User talk:Polling 2#GDP nominal of Kolkata is actually 170-180 billion $ according to Statistical institute of India.. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 05:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your concern!

I was separating the lists of tenants of the old One World Trade Center and the new One World Trade Center into Two different articles, as they are two different buildings, which share the same name. Again, Thank you for your concern! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnificent879 (talk • contribs) 09:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@Omnificent879: Ah, I see. I would suggest you when doing large changes like these, you should write the reason for it in the edit summary. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 09:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This section has been blanked due to being a troll message from a vandal. Refer to Special:PermanentLink/1006762516 for the original content. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 08:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 08:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 86.17.210.97 (talk) 09:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC) you have made a spelling mistake

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 15:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

January 2021 GOCE Drive bling

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Aseleste for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)