Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nebraska
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Nebraska page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | United States: Nebraska Project‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Photo request: Northwest High School[edit]
Could somebody take some photos of Northwest High School and upload them to commons, for use in Northwest High School (Grand Island, Nebraska)? Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Monolith Inc. Draft[edit]
Hello! I'm Robin from Beutler Ink. I've posted a draft article on behalf of our client Monolith Inc. at Articles for Creation. Because of my COI, I am looking for editors who might be interested in the topic to review the draft. If you'd like to take a look, you can find it here. I welcome feedback and suggestions. Cheers! BINK Robin (talk) 16:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting[edit]
|
Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for African Americans in Omaha, Nebraska[edit]
African Americans in Omaha, Nebraska has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments[edit]
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)