Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 30, 2022
- Gog, did you intentionally post this blurb without an image? your draft of this blurb includes one, and since tfa blurbs of nasa astronauts generally include a photo of the astronaut, i am guessing that the omission was an inadvertent error, but i did not want to restore the image unilaterally in case it wasn't. dying (talk) 03:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi dying, apologies for the delayed response, I have been on a break. It was a deliberate omission, only entirely free use images are permitted on the main page. If there is such an image, please add it. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Gog, no worries about the delay; your break was well deserved. was the image used in your draft not an "entirely free use image"? its description on commons states that it is in the public domain as a work of nasa. the blurb for nasa astronaut david scott uses a photo that is similarly described on commons, and the resnik image has previously been approved for use on the main page, in a dyk nomination. dying (talk) 01:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. Added. Let's see how it goes. I suggest you keep an eye on Errors. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Gog, no worries about the delay; your break was well deserved. was the image used in your draft not an "entirely free use image"? its description on commons states that it is in the public domain as a work of nasa. the blurb for nasa astronaut david scott uses a photo that is similarly described on commons, and the resnik image has previously been approved for use on the main page, in a dyk nomination. dying (talk) 01:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi dying, apologies for the delayed response, I have been on a break. It was a deliberate omission, only entirely free use images are permitted on the main page. If there is such an image, please add it. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hawkeye7, i am assuming that you had not meant to remove the "and" between "the fourth woman" and "the second American woman" in this edit, but i am not sure what you had intended to do. i was thinking of removing the "and" between "biomedical engineer," and "pilot", as i feel that "pilot" in the blurb is the second element in a list with three elements. had that been the "and" you had intended to remove? dying (talk) 03:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Amateurs?[edit]
Could the article lede, and the TFA blurb, make clear whether the club (today) is professional or amateur? DePiep (talk) 08:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)