Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Lists of World Wrestling Entertainment champions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling NA‑class
WikiProject iconFeatured topics/Lists of World Wrestling Entertainment champions is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the page attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Working definition[edit]

The working definition for this topic is "lists of wrestlers who have held any of the currently active championships in World Wrestling Entertainment". --MarcK 08:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page should be changed to "Lists of World Wrestling Entertainment champions".

'Current' should be taken off, because they are LISTS of every champion, not just the current one. Lex94 00:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I can't imagine this being controversial, so I'll be bold and change it without going through the nomination process. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 23:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, just found this. The problem with the rename is that only lists pertaining to CURRENT championships are included in the topic, those pertaining to former championships are excluded. Maybe it should be changed back...? rst20xx (talk) 17:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vital improvements[edit]

This topic meets current criteria perfectly. --MarcK 08:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential improvements[edit]

As all articles in the topic are of FL quality, there is little to be improved. --MarcK 08:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible additions[edit]

As of now there is nothing to be added that I can see, though naturally if a championship is revived or retired then the topic would have to be modified. --MarcK 08:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]