Wikipedia talk:Department of Fun/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Wikipedia:What the Wikipedian saw

The above page has been created to be a part of this department. Neither I nor the creator know how to do that though. I hope at least one of you wonderful people take up the opportunity it provides to create another "story that never ends. John Carter (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I've userfied it to its creator's userspace; it can now be found at User:Darkside2000/What the Wikipedian saw. Obviously, if DoF members decide that it should be part of the DoF, it can be moved accordingly. Walton^One 18:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Transwiki

This should be transwiki'd to Wikiversity. This makes no sense here. --Emesee (talk) 06:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

MfD discussion

See Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Kimera_Kat/Three_word_story for a deletion discussion of a page listed here. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi all

Where to register our name in this project??Suyogaerospace^{talk to me!} 16:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Animal Quiz restarted, but at MFD

Hi all! I noticed that the Portal:Animals/Quiz was at MFD, so I stepped in and asked a new question to try and save it. If any of you want to participate, come on over and make a guess! If you get it right, you get to ask the next question. Cheers! SunDragon34 (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Let's add DOF template to talk pages of humor pages

I looked at where the humor template is transcluded and I also saw the DOF template is only on the DOF page. So I suggest that it should be added to funny WP namespace pages that are not intended to appear to have a serious purpose (e.g. the wikiclinic). We could add it to the talk pages of those articles. I also think we should add a "funnyiness" like wikiprojects have a "rating" box. Sounds good?--Ipatrol (talk) 20:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Having come here after the template was added to WP:LAME, I wholeheartedly agree. Where have you guys been all my wikilife? This place gets so dry and po-faced at times. Totnesmartin (talk) 20:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

I have begun the template-adding process and anyone is welcome to help. One we have finished getting those pages we can then begin the slightly serious, but still potentially funny, task of improving, updating, and humorfying those pages, just like any other wikiproject does with their pages, but with a phunny :-) twist.--Ipatrol (talk) 20:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

I have created Category:WikiProject Department of Fun for all the pages categorized for the DOF. It's automatically added by the {{Department of Fun}} template. Let the scramble for the funny begin--Ipatrol (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

The answer to life, the universe and...a new holiday?

The number 42 is almost universally celebrated by everyone on a project that is supposed to encompass all human knowledge. Even Jimbo Wales acknowledges the number. So therefore I propose that the 42nd day of the year (I believe it is Febuary 11th) become Life, Universe, and Everything day. While holidays have been traditionaly been created by Jimbo, he has said that we don't need his approval for every little thing. So what do you think?--Ipatrol (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Sounds great! Totnesmartin (talk) 08:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, why not? How can we celebrate this day? --I dream of horses (T) @ 03:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Life, Universe, and Everything Day.--Ipatrol (talk) 16:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Funny edit summaries

I've started up a collection of amusing edit summaries, if anyone has any to add you can do so here, but no vandalism-related edits please. There's also a list of interesting usernames I've come across. OlEnglish (talk) 00:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Gone now. OlEnglish ^(Talk) 02:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikistory

The Wikistory was speedy-deleted yesterday. I am rather ambivalent about this (on the one hand, the Wikistory seems like a lot of space to waste on silliness in an encyclopedia; on the other, I am fond of Wikipedia's loopy subculture). However, I thought I should at least bring it to the attention of people who feel more strongly about it, especially as deletion has been discussed and voted down before. Incidentally, the Sentence Wikistory still exists, but is barely more coherent than the original and could conceivably be deleted under the same criterion. A. Parrot (talk) 23:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

That's too bad, it could just as easily been tagged as historical, and along with all the other silliness in Category:Wikipedia humor why did this particular one have to go? It's just not fair <sniff>. -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 02:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

BTW, where's the AfD (or MfD rather) discussion for is? I see the previous two here but where's yesterday's? -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 03:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

If it was speedily deleted, chances are that the administrator took it on themselves to delete it without an MFD. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I notified User:A Man In Black about this, as he was the one who deleted it. Simon^KSK 03:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Probably better to tag it as humor and move along. If he doesn't reverse it, just take it to DRV. Protonk (talk) 04:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I speedied it because, well, it was nonsense for nonsense's sake, and we have a CSD for patent nonsense, and I am COLD UNFEELING ROBOMINISTRATOR, HERE TO DESTROY ALL FUN. I didn't notice that there were some ancient MFDs, though, but it flunked CSD G1 and the HTBFANJS test. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 04:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, I like that link. :) -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 06:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

ps. might as well speedy the wikistory talk page too.. I'm assuming the two earlier discussions are archived somewhere else so we won't lose them? -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 06:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I've put this up for deletion review: Wikipedia:Deletion review#Wikistory.--ragesoss (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

My Talk Page?

Kausill

Click discussion. You can find my talk page there. There is a little game there in which you can add rules to my talk page; in the theme of FightClub. So I'm wondering whether I should add it to DOF. Suggestions? Kausill (talk) 03:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiSong The Musical!

LOL. Something along the lines of

Wikipedian: Hehe, now that I've signed up on Wikipedia I'm going to vanda-

Beurocrat: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here are a few tips to get you started!

First of all -

Wikipedian: Er... dude. I just signed up 'cause I want to vandalise Wikipedia.

Beurocrat: :(. No. First thing you have to learn is WikiLove!

Wikipedian: WikiWhat?

Beurocrat: WikiLove! Come on! Sing with me!

WikiLove You!

WikiLove Me!

Let's all go and save Jimmey,

With a CAPSLOCK, edit war

Vandal get's the block.

That IP is gone for good! HOORAY!

Wikipedian: Er... WikiLove? More like WikiBLAMBLAMBLAM.

:Beaurocrat: Blam-Blam-Blam? Oh I get you! You're from NewGrounds!

Something stupid like that. It will be a collaborative effort. Kausill (talk) 08:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

My userpage

I have a fun userpage and a fun signature. Do I win a prize? Yours very greedily, Kayau David Copperfield MOBY DICK the great gatsby 06:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed game.

"Constitution". In this game, you just add rules to define how to play it and what you must and can't do. If you have a question about how this is supposed to work or a problem you can see with the concept, you can add an rule or rules to fix it. Nothing is disallowed till a rule disallows it. Don't kill the game by making it impossible or too annoying to play, please.

It's been some fun to play when I started it here and a few other sites. I'm not sure if it would work worse or better as a Wiki game then a forum game though. Anyway, opinions?--<color=orange> Occono </color> (talk) 09:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

"Laps" The user starts at one article and then goes to say 6 (or some other number) of articles which come back to the article. Its based upon the 6 degrees game, but instead of terminationg, you would loop. Ex: Las Cruces, NM → White Sands Test Facility → White Sands Missile Range → V-2 → Wernher von Braun → Huntsville, AL → Marshall Space Flight Center → Project Apollo → Frank Borman → Las Cruces, NM —Preceding unsigned comment added by BK2011 (talk • contribs) 05:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

The Porn Section

Why do we not have it yet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.129.137.188 (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Don't be silly. This is the DoF, not the DoST (Department of Stupid Things). That kind of thing only appears in Wikipedia because of WP:CENSORED. Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 14:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Word association games

Is there a reason why the various word association games are not listed here? The main game is at Wikipedia:Sandbox/Word Association (WP:SB/WA), see {{Word Association}} for links to the spinoff games. Thryduulf (talk) 01:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Boxes!

{{User:TheGreenMartian/UBX/nuke}}

Good for talk page nuclear wars.

This user will nuke you if you try to delete their pages.
Wikipedia Department of Fun

TheGreenMartian (talk) 22:26, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Umm

Shouldn't it be called the Department of WikiFun or does that already exist? Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 00:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Icon

I have created an icon for all of you to join. Use {{User:Hi878/DoF Icon}} It uses {{topicon}} and can be positioned in the same way. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 18:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man

Look: It´s not bottom class, isn`t it?--Müdigkeit (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Lol. Well, it is the Department of Fun....a little fun with the rating system never hurt anyone. That's what I'm making it out to be. If you're bothered by it, fix it. Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

of course not.--Müdigkeit (talk) 23:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Joining

Could I possibly Join the Department of Fun? I think i have a user page which could be added to the list of fun things. Thanks, Thomas888b (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes of course. Anyone can join. -- œ^™ 05:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

ah, cool, what do I need to do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas888b (talk • contribs) 18:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Just add your name to the list of members. :) ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 18:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I would never just add my name to the list of members of any club that would let me just add my name to the list of members. Hm, doesn't have the same flow. —Tamfang (talk) 23:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

If you're looking for something to do, just mosey on over to WP:TCG. Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Administration

I believe that this project needs an administration, due to the high number of members. Please contact me on my talk page. Laleena^{Talk to me} _{Contributions to Wikipedia} 14:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Entertainment site

SunnyWorld.TK —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplesunny (talk • contribs) 10:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello MBA Top colleges all over India visit Boys.2Hell.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplysunny 7 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Two categories were started about 6 months apart. Both websites, when entered, redirect to Sunny Khetarpal's blogspot. I've merged the second topic called 'MBA Top Colleges' which was only that second comment, into the original. Someone can feel free to delete it altogether as it doesn't look very fun to me. Tyciol (talk) 01:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Department of Fun

What's the department of fun, & the wikipedia Fun Police what's the difference and what do they do or achieve. SKYNET X7000 (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Cancelled comment. SKYNET X7000 (talk) 14:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Wilkington Crescent

Has dissappeared from the page? -Unsigned

Policy

Please note that the template I added stating this page is a policy is just another April Fools joke, and if someone gets offended (which there will be someone) revert it. No need to leave me any messages or anything, I am perfectly well aware I am responsible for my actions. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 18:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Template

What hapened to the template? it's different. It used to be a conical flask with purple bubbles in a triangle. munchman | talk; 12:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah! I always thought it was a triangle like now.--Faizaguo 16:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

can black sheep make white sheep use their own brain

On a one-funny-man quest to keep Wikipedia alive ...

.. Some Great Walls are visible form the moon (Great China Wall), some are history (Berlin Wall). Some have foundations already in place (Look mindfully around and inside yourself to name them). Some are invisible like the wall that separates the slave men and free men or the wall that separates still men and walking men..

http://bolekwesolowski.blogspot.com/2010/11/wikipedia-for-me-is-taste-of-better.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.12.34.137 (talk) 05:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

RfC

Please visit the following RfC: WP:TCG/Rules#Precedence of target articles. Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

My April Fools Plans

Could I have some feedback/suggestions for april fools?
See This Page.
Thanks,
Thomas888b (Say Hi) 20:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Don't tell us your plans, you'll spoil it! -- œ^™ 23:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Rating articles related to the Department of Fun

Hello there, I've created a subsection to the project's template to assess articles related to the scope of the project, the first one is going to be the 4chan article.

Have a good day yall and happy wiki editing

Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 15:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

The banner at the very top of WP:Department of fun says the articles in namespace are not within this project. Besides, your choice of which articles are "related" to this topic is subjective; it seems you have only tagged articles related to Internet memes and Internet subculture. People's ideas of what articles are "fun" are sure to vary. I have removed your additions. rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

I've added articles related to Internet memes and Internet subculture as they are cited by several members of this project and even within the project's own page. And they all have a humorous esquee. And they are not literally related to comedy. --Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 16:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Again, that is your opinion. The fact that they are articles about topics that you find entertaining does not mean they themselves are "geared towards Wikitainment". They are encyclopedia articles (as every article on Wikipedia mainspace is), and the articles themselves should not contain jokes or games. Please seek consensus before plastering a new template across numerous talk pages throughout Wikipedia. rʨanaɢ (talk) 21:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

This project banner is not meant for articles in mainspace. It's a Wikipedia WikiProject, meant for "providing the Wikipedian community, both young and old editors, with things to make them stay at Wikipedia, indirectly improving the encyclopedia". It's not a project for improving article content. -- œ^™ 12:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Furthermore, all those categories you created such as Category:FA-Class Department of Fun articles should be deleted, as they will never be populated. I understand you were doing this in good faith, but it's really is not within the scope of this project. I can assure you that tag spamming multiple articles with the DoF banner will bring undue attention to this project, and we'll have content editors yelling at our doorstep. -- œ^™ 12:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Rjanag and OE are correct; this tagging should cease and be reversed. Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

I have deleted the categories, and MfD'ed/TfD'ed some other related pages that were created. See

• Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Department of Fun/Assessment
• Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 February 21#Template:WikiProject Department of Fun/Rating

rʨanaɢ (talk) 19:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Reminder...

edit forgot my tildes, oh my!98.82.80.189 (talk) 19:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Page containing hoax articles

Hey there ppl, I was browsing through AfD, when I came across, Natiopolian an article that IMO was very fun, so I came across an idea, why don't we keep trace of those articles to see which one is the most funny? We could archive them like a game, and we even !vote to see which one is the funniest (1 out of 3 in a hoax challenge). Cheers Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 05:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Have you read this? WP:BOBJAODN The Interior (Talk) 05:14, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

That's been done to some extent. Either: Wikipedia:N things not to write your article about or Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create if I'm not mistaken.Prapsnot 2.0 (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Bestiary

I have an idea for a game I call Bestiary. The user is attempting to create a zoo, but may only include animals whose articles he has improved. First user to reach 100 animals in his zoo wins! Pinguinus (talk) 17:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

I win. You may interested in helping out with the WP:TCG. Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Cabal

An editor went on an anti-cabal spree a few hours ago (including userspace essays, which is Not Okay). I've reverted the ones I noticed in the recent contributions, but I believe that Category:Wikipedia Cabal Decrees is still about half the size that it used to be.

It might be worth considering these articles and seeing which ones are more appropriately listed in which categories. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Shhhhh....there is no cabal! Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

He's trying to hide The Truth from the People! This! Cannot! Be! --illythr (talk) 18:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedian Book of Myths

I would love to be in charge of a page that was devoted to so-called myths of Wikipedia, like the end of Wikipedia. However, I know I wouldn't be able to do it all by myself, so I'll need other people to join before I start. Thank you in advance! Pumagirl7 ^{Leave a message} 21:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

I'd suggest calling it WikiLore, rather than myths...myths sound like misunderstandings about us. Oh, and I got around to that Lyngbakr page tonight. Care to run your eyes across it and see if you can improve upon it? I know you're interested in that sort of thing. The big question I have though is whether to treat it as a myth or a cryptid-- obviously we know now that it's not real, but in reading the account, it appeared it could have been an honest explanation given by someone who simply got embarrassingly lost at sea. Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

WikiLore... yes, that sounds rather nice indeed. Would you be willing to help out? Looking at the lyngbakr page, "myth" sounds like it would be a better title for the creature because of the lack of sightings of the creature. I think that it looks good. I took care of removing red links, and I'll be scanning Wikimedia Commons for a fitting picture. Pumagirl7 ^{Leave a message} 14:48, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

{{5~}} ...does anyone else find this funny?

I think {{5~}}, {{4~}}, and {{3~}}, are hilarious templates. Is this just me? Someone actually nominated {{5~}} and {{3~}} for deletion. Should we add them to our project? Other than humor, I think they're useless. Prapsnot 2.0 (talk) 01:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Great Idea!

I just have to say that I absolutely LOVE the idea of the Department of Fun! --Likestodraw (talk) 04:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Heh, yeah. It's a cool article. ReginaldTQ (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

A new article

I have just created a new article called Wikipedia: Wikilinkitis, which drew inspiration from Wikipedia: Editcountitis. I know it is not much at present, but would any one like to look at it to improve it. After all, it could get recommended for deletion if it does not get improved. I shall therefore be grateful if any one could improve it. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

The Odd Editor

Maybe there should be a game/activity thing where somebody has a Wikimedia Commons picture of some sort of animal doing something odd, and based on that picture users come up with the edits that animal would make if it possessed the ability to use the computer. Brambleberry, RiverClan Medicine Cat ^{Visit ♠ Follow} —Preceding undated comment added 23:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC).

Sure, who can find the cutest picture for the caption, "Cat, the other white meat"? RJH (talk) 19:29, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

New BJAODN Article

Can you help me make another BJAODN article? The article is entitled Wikipedia:BJAODN 2012. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myrtle Milka (talk • contribs) 12:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Editcountitis

"Wikipedia:Editcountitis" has been moved to "Wikipedia:Obsessive Edit-counting Disorder". Discussion as to which is the best name can be found at Wikipedia talk:Obsessive Edit-counting Disorder#Praise for the new name. benzband (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

cool ReginaldTQ (talk) 04:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Bottom category

It looks like the bottom– importance category is getting overly crowded. We may have to add a "bare bottom" category to make more room. Regards, RJH (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Support Jesse V. (talk) 18:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

What would go in the "bare bottom" category? Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Chat ♠ Watch} 18:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Probably not Wedgie, but perhaps Debagging, Mooning and Bare-ass? Regards, RJH (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Very funny. What I'm saying is that if you make a new category there has to be certain criteria to separate it. Therefore, maybe active DoF pages would remain "bottom" while inactive moved to "bare bottom". Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Chat ♠ Watch} 19:24, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Sigh. RJH (talk)

Lolcat WikiLove

Since in the "Food WikiLove" category there's a "cheezburgr", commonly associated with Lolcats, should there be a template in animal WikiLove for an Lolcat? Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Chat ♠ Watch} 17:23, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

+1 benzband (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

+1 I think there should be one. --_Macbookair3140 15:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done To both of you: It has been created! Template:Lolcat Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Chat ♠ Watch} 19:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

WikiFauna

We have an overwhelming amount of WikiFauna, and some of them differ greatly in terms of article length and insight. For example, WikiDragon is much longer and deeper than WikiMule. Therefore, I believe that we should have a standard "skeleton" of headers and subheaders for WikiFauna that all will fill in. I was thinking of a cross between WikiDragon and WikiPuma, as they are two of the longest WikiFauna articles, and while they both share some, like "Attributes, Values, and Powers", they differ in some. For example, WikiPuma doesn't have "Theories on origin" or "Taxonomy", but WikiDragon doesn't have "Juveniles" or "Overworking". Agreement? Disagreement? Comments? Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Chat ♠ Watch} 13:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

UPDATE! I created an example of the skeleton as well as a base of what should go there at my sandbox. Is there anything I should do? Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Chat ♠ Watch} 16:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Are we having fun yet? Regards, RJH (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Why are there no WikiFlora?    → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ Ⓜ 20:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

That would be great! I'd be a bee balm or something. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 03:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

A vote on the top 10 lamest edit wars

I suggest we vote on the top 10 lamest edit wars in the history of Wikipedia (if you don't know what I'm talking about, Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars will tell you everything about lame edit wars). The purpose of this is to have a special section on the page where the lamest of the lamest edit wars are documented. The guidelines are below:

1. You may vote for up to 5 edit wars. Your top pick (the very lamest edit war, in your opinion) gets 5 points, your second pick gets 4 points, and so on, down to your fifth pick, which gets one point.

2. At the end of the vote (a week from now or after 15 people have voted, whichever comes later), the 10 edit wars with the most points will be the "winners", in order of points scored (the edit war with the most points out of every edit war in wiki-history will be considered the #1 lamest edit war, the one with the second-most points will be #2, and so on). The 10 "winners" will be moved to a special section of Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars to be recognized as the lamest of the lamest edit wars.

3. I will manage the vote; no one else needs to count points or move edit wars to the Top 10 section. You're welcome to help, but don't think I can't handle it.

4. Be specific when voting. Don't leave us in the dark; provide details, especially when the edit war is not listed on Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars (please also provide diffs when the war is unlisted).

5. For the purposes of this vote, wheel wars and deletion wars may be counted as edit wars.

6. Provide reasons for your votes, but be civil and don't provoke others.

7. Vote at the bottom of the section.

8. Questions? Ask me!

I hope this vote is a fun project. Good luck! ChromaNebula (talk) 00:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I like it. I'll take my vote right now.

1. Bathrobe (image) - Come on, it started its own cabal!

2. Cow Tipping (image) - It ended with "A cow in its natural upright state", which in my opinion is almost as bad as the original "An unsuspecting potential victim?"

3. Grand Theft Auto IV (ethnic) - Because we all care about the nationality of a VIDEO GAME CHARACTER.

4. Cute (wording) - Because nothing is more important than deciding whether the word "cute" applied to something makes it NPOV.

5. Katie Couric (wording) - Let's just call her an entertaining journalist and be done with it. (And no, it is not necessary to mention that she drops "g"s at the end of words).

Hope that helped! Brambleberry of RiverClan ^{Mew ♠ Tail} 13:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiFauna Addition!

Hey I have a addition to the wikifauna to add! Its called the WikiBorg! I was hoping you guys could make the page so I can get to work on it :D Andrew Wiggin (talk) 15:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Everyone get in here

Everyone get in here

Hello there I invite anyone to discuss our plans on Wikipedia talk:April fools/April Fools' Day 2013 pranks. Regards Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 04:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Saying hello and ideas

I'm saying hi because I have known about all of you for a while. I am a big fan of the wiki movies and games :) 1. I agree that Grand Theft Auto was the lamest war 2. There should be some video game/TV related Wikilove. Who agrees there? 3. to brambleberry, how do you make your Teh Flying Corgi (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC) different fonts?

MfD nomination

Several of the children of this project (Word Association) have been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association. If you wish to weigh in the debate please feel free. Hasteur (talk) 14:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

World Knowledge Medal.gif

image:World Knowledge Medal.gif has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

It has been renominated for deletion - -65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC)