Wikipedia talk:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEssays Mid‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
MidThis page has been rated as Mid-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Reliability of interviews for establishing notability[edit]

While interview content isn't necessarily fact-checked, shouldn't the fact that reputable media outlets choose to interview a person (in depth, about themselves, as opposed to on a topic they are an expert in) be evidence of their notability? If not, that should be explicitly stated as a sentence, with some justification of the thinking behind it, in the page. GenomeFan92 (talk) 17:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Common_sourcing_mistakes_(notability)&oldid=987378990"