Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion is not a war zone

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Many more essays[edit]

Wikipedia:Notability/RFC:Reevaluation#Journalists Ikip (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, what a gold mine of information! interesting to see how the inclusion - deletion dimension is viewed by reliable sources. FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on this essay[edit]

[This reply was rather long, so I put it on its own page: User:Robofish/Thoughts on inclusionism and deletionism.] Robofish (talk) 23:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to project space[edit]

Looking over the history on this essay and seeing how much the community has expanded and improved on this essay over time, it seems worthwhile to move this essay into project space, since it is certainly good advice that more people should follow... SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Gutting" an article during deletion discussion[edit]

User:Cirt/Gutting

I've created an essay on Gutting an article during deletion discussion.

You may find it interesting reading at: User:Cirt/Gutting.

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 18:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Counterpoint[edit]

Yes it is. Bacchiad (talk) 01:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it's meant as sarcasm?! --MurderByDeletionism^"bang!" 22:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Work[edit]

A must read for all of us. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]