Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW

Main case page (Talk) — Preliminary statements (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: Dreamy Jazz (Talk) Drafting arbitrators: Izno (Talk) & Guerillero (Talk)

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

With deep regret, it is time to remove the tools

 Clerk note: Moved from the Evidence page as deemed not evidence. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

I have nothing to add in factual evidence or debate that has not already been covered by the discussion at WP:AN and the later discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW/Preliminary statements. AlisonW has been a remarkable contributor to the project and I deeply regret that things have reached this point. If at some point they demonstrate both an adequate understanding of the WP:P&G relating to administration and a willingness to abide by the community's expectations in that regard, I would happily support them in a future RfA. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Link to AN discussion

Hey, all, I was just looking over this case and notice that on the main case page, under prior dispute resolution, you just have a link to WP:AN. It should probably be changed to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive353#Potentially involved block by AlisonW that will directly link to the discussion that is referred to in the arbitrators' comments. Thanks for all of your work on this. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! It has been updated by Izno. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

In case this wasn't seen

• [1]

That said, I suggest holding off on doing so until her current situation is resolved (presuming she does not do any admin actions in the meantime).

I don't think that anyone would argue that we all may say things which in hindsight we might later wish to retract, especially when grieving. So I think we could probably give her at least some space for the opportunity to do that, if she wishes, later. - jc37 17:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

It's been noted by the Committee. SilkTork (talk) 17:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the update. - jc37 17:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

And as a 'Crat I wouldn't take that as a desysop request. And I doubt if any of my colleagues would. SilkTork (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)