Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jeff King (consultant)

KEEP He is quite notable and has many sources. --Wikipietime (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Solid sources[edit]

Article should be kept Wikipietime (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

Is it proper protocol for an editor who has marked the article for deletion, to make edits to the article?--Wikipietime (talk) 07:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with my edits, please discuss them on article talk. Toddst1 (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

Need more participation from editorial community! Should deletion occur, I would like to present other comparable entries for consideration to be deleted. --Wikipietime (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're free to nominate any article that doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion at any time. In fact you should nominate articles that don't meet the criteria without delay. No need to make not-so veiled threats along the lines of "if this one is deleted I will nominate others". This article is being judged on its merits, regardless of whether other stuff exists. Lard Almighty (talk) 18:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]