Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff King (consultant)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:04, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff King (consultant)[edit]

Jeff King (consultant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC by a wide margin. With the exception of this article on the Local page of the Sioux City Iowa Journal, nothing but passing mentions and a few quotations found (even after asking author). WP:BLP1E (and not a very notable E) and WP:NOTINHERITED also apply. Toddst1 (talk) 13:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: I disagree, a reasonably short search will see that he has many sources of citation and has sought publicity for his father and, in turn, his abilities as a political, pr, operative.--Wikipietime (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can find nothing of substance on Jeff. Even the CNN article mentions him in the context of his father (son signs on to a campaign which is an indicator of how his father is leaning - the important bit is what it says about his father's supposed views). Notability is not inherited. He may have worked for his father etc., but I am not seeing notability in its own right. Lard Almighty (talk) 07:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lard Almighty what about this statement "Except this article on the Local page of the Sioux City Iowa Journal, nothing but passing mentions and a few quotations found (even after asking author). " refering to http://siouxcityjournal.com/news/local/a1/jeff-king-plays-big-role-in-his-father-s-campaigns/article_0337fbe5-fd7c-52af-b9e9-c9b11bd38c42.html
It is of substance and by an Iowa institution Sioux City Journal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipietime (talkcontribs) 15:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of people who aren't notable play big roles in lots of things. Simply haven't come up with the kind of coverage (certainly not "many sources of citation") I would need to see to change my mind. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPOL, & WP:GNG. Mr. King is the son of and is/was the campaign manager for his father Steve King, the Congressman from Iowa, but I have been unable to find any in-depth reliable sources that cover Jeff King (apart from his job in his father's campaign) in depth. Shearonink (talk) 22:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.