Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville/Peer review
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Front Page | Departments: Tasks • Resources • Participation & outreach • Project talk (Start a new topic) |  | |
Develop/Expand: Stubs (Full List) • To do's • Undercat? • Photos/images (Requests) • Other article needs | ||
Articles Needing Action | Cleanup: Alphabetic • By Category • Old by Year | Assess: Quality • Importance | ||
WikiProject Louisville Alerts have been posted:
Articles for deletion
Categories for discussion
Good article nominees
WikiProject Kentucky Alerts have been posted:
Articles for deletion
Categories for discussion
Templates for discussion
Featured article candidates
Featured list candidates
Good article nominees
Peer reviews
Articles for creation
WikiProject Indiana Alerts have been posted:
Articles for deletion
Good article nominees
Articles for creation
| ||
- 1.3% List-Class
- 34.4% Stub-Class
- 49% Start-Class
- 10.5% C-Class
- 3.5% B-Class
- 1% GA-Class
- 0.3% FA-Class
- 0% remaining
This is the former WikiProject Louisville Peer Review department.
Editors with article requests involving significant policy and/or POV concerns or edit wars should use Wikipedia:Third opinion, Wikipedia:Requests for comment, and/or Noticeboards (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard for living persons and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents for others.) before a peer review.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors — usually members of WikiProject Louisville. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete. Please consider reviewing someone else's article too, if you request yours :-)
Instructions[edit]
WikiProject peer reviews
This inactive or historical peer review page has had its instructions updated for posterity's sake. That's because there is now a Wikipedia Peer Review that peer reviews can be listed at, and the old instructions were out of date and may cause problems (or disappointment as not many people may see your review). If this page ever becomes active again, see here for a way to keep reviews up to date.
To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here.