Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fovean Author
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:Fovean Author[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Fovean Author (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
64.45.236.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Shem(talk) 02:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
- Back in March, User:Fovean Author and the IP address User:64.45.236.60 both voted delete on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A More Perfect Union. Fovean Author's first vote was worded innocuously [1], while the subsequent IP vote was extremely uncivil [2] ("What, every time he farts in an elevator, you want to make a Wikipedia entry?"). Fovean Author's IP vote drew immediate suspicion, but there was no evidence to act upon.
- Today, in a discussion at Talk:Barack Obama, the IP address returned to vote in a content poll; two minutes later User:Fovean Author signed in to claim the vote as his.
- Between March 19th and March 22nd 2008, User:Fovean Author edited A More Perfect Union, an Obama-related article, with both his account and his IP address. During this time period, he edit-warred on his IP address over controversial insertions with administrator User:Bigtimepeace [3] [4], who's tried to mediate Obama-related disputes more recently. While using his IP to insert negative material, he used his account to delete positive material.
- Comments
User:Fovean Author's been a fundamentally disruptive partisan editor, leveling the worst personal (userpage vandalism with personal attacks) attacks ("your messiah Obama") of the recent flare-ups at Barack Obama. He's now inadvertently outed his past sockpuppetry, and should be banned for disruption, personal attacks, incivility, and all-around tendentious editing. Shem(talk) 02:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
- User blocked for 6 months for abuse of editing privileges via sockpuppetry, disruption, personal attacks, incivility, and tendentious editing. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hidden category: