Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fioranoweb (3rd)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Fioranoweb[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Fioranoweb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Report submission by

A. B. ^(talk) 13:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Fiorano Software has been waging an ongoing PR effort on Wikipedia for 2 years, spamming links and articles

Links

fiorano.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Now blacklisted

Spam articles created as blatant advertising and deleted by Wikipedia administrators

Atul saini
FIO ITPL
FIORANO - deleted 3 times
Fiorano ESB™ 2006
Fiorano SOA Platform
Fiorano Software - deleted 9 times
FioranoMQ™ 2006
Mr. Atul Saini - deleted 4 times
Mr. Srinivas Tati, - deleted 3 times
Mr. Vinod K. Dham , - deleted 2 times
Vinod K. Dham
Mr. Christopher Combs
Image:Fiorano logo.png - deleted 4 times
User:Sanjaya fiorano
- User page created as a spam page.
User:Sanjaya123
- User page created as a spam page.
User:Fiorano123
- User page created as a spam page.
User:Itpl fiorano
- User page created as a spam page.
User:Sanjayakumarsahu
- User page created as a spam page.

Articles vandalized

References

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#Fiorano Software (again) (permanent link) —Preceding unsigned comment added by A. B. (talk • contribs) 14:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Fioranoweb--A. B. ^(talk) 15:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I have indefinitely blocked all the registered accounts. 125.16.137.130 is registered to the company and I have blocked it indefinitely as well.
There was no "first case"; the only previous report was Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fioranoweb (2nd)
No additional action appears to be required; I have made this report as a matter of record

--A. B. ^(talk) 13:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Perhaps you should ask a checkuser to identify any sleeper accounts that may be associated with these. I find that shutting down all the accounts at once can discourage them from making further attempts at evasion. You can file code 'F', block evasion, use a link to this report as the evidence, and specifically request identification of sleeper accounts. Additionally, checkuser will confirm the relationship and might identify any innocent party caught in the sweep, though I do not think that has happened here. Jehochman ^Talk 14:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opened here. ~Eliz81 ^(C) 22:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]