Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yongle the Great/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Yongle the Great

Yongle the Great (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date February 5 2010, 23:58 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Regancy42 (talk)

Mass reverts in favor of blocked user. Regancy42 (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions

 Clerk note: all the accounts have been blocked indefinitely (the two suspected socks by Dougweller), and tagged. SpitfireTally-ho! 09:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Report date March 26 2010, 05:01 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by _LDS (talk)

This editor has been editing the same pages using different accounts. Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Yongle the Great for the rest of the sockpuppets. _LDS (talk) 05:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Yongle the Great for the rest of the sockpuppets. _LDS (talk) 05:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by _LDS (talk) 05:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: case moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/14 Blades to /Yongle the Great SpitfireTally-ho! 10:28, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: case from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhou dynasty merged SpitfireTally-ho! 12:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

 Clerk note: all these accounts are now blocked and tagged SpitfireTally-ho! 12:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Report date March 27 2010, 04:36 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by _LDS (talk)

I suspect that this is another one of User:Yongle the Great's sockpuppets. He's a "regular customer" on SPI. The clerks should be quite familiar with him. _LDS (talk) 04:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by _LDS (talk) 04:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: case moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/First Sovereign Qin Emperor to /Yongle the Great SpitfireTally-ho! 08:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
23 May 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡)

The articles edited by the editor are from the same topic as those edited by the sockpuppeteer previously. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 03:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wuxinghongqi05, please see there for original history. SpitfireTally-ho! 11:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.

 Clerk endorsed account has been blocked by Dougweller (talk · contribs). Self endorsed for a sleeper check, please (given this edit and this edit, there's little doubt this is a sock). Thanks, SpitfireTally-ho! 11:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. No positively identified sleepers. A rangeblock should be possible if he starts to come back more frequently. J.delanoygabsadds 04:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Tags fixed, already blocked --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 04:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
27 June 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡)

暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 01:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can tell that it's Yongle the Great again, based on his contributions log and editing style. He gave himself away again by choosing another "emperor" username. This time, he's using a Russian ruler's name. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 13:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Rangeblock please as before. Thanks. And earlier this year there were certainly some sleepers. Dougweller (talk) 04:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We now have {[user|113.161.226.163}} as well and Peter I the Great (talk · contribs). Dougweller (talk) 13:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
CheckUser requests
  •  Clerk endorsed - Looking at user's contribs, there's enough for a check here. T. Canens (talk) 03:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Given the Prod edits and adding a link to a website where previous socks have used information there to add to articles, I've blocked the account as a sock. If a check is still necessary, it may only be for looking for sleepers. Icestorm815 • Talk 04:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sleepers and rangeblock, I'd say. T. Canens (talk) 04:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: merged a case from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peter I the Great, SpitfireTally-ho! 14:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found Narnia (country) (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) on his IP. It seems that Dougweller has already concluded that 113.161.226.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is this user's IP, so you may extend the block on it if you wish. There is nothing else for me to do. --Deskana (talk) 13:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, in this case I shall the executioner as well as the judge and jury. Blocked the sock account and extended the IP block to a one-month hard block. --Deskana (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
01 August 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky [edit]

Has already been reported, but I think it's still necessary to create a case page for him. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 05:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
  • Jpgordon is already involved in checking these accounts and has blocked the sockpuppets. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:56, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per my comment. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:56, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I fell asleep!
 Confirmed. Also:
  1. Villa Villekulla (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Bamboo.2002 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  3. LonelyKnight360 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  4. 唐人 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  5. 唐 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  6. Bambou.2002 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  7. Yo Ho (A Pirate's Life for Me) (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  8. Tuổi thanh xuân (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
I've reinstated the previous checkuser block on 113.161.226.181. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:56, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
17 August 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky [edit]

The latter three have been confirmed to be sockpuppets of banned User:Yongle the Great. Levin Zhang. This edit by Villa Villekulla is exactly the same as these edits by Levin Zhang and this edit by Bamboo.2002 and this edit by Dieu et mon droit. This banned user also has a habit of not using edit summaries. Besides, he also edits only Ming Dynasty-related articles, just as Yongle the Great's sockpuppets do. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 13:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]

Moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Levin Zhang wiooiw (talk) 14:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. This case should be moved to Yongle the Great, as the sockmaster. I also think a sleeper sweep would be a good idea. TNXMan 13:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk endorsed per the new accounts that have popped up. There might be others out there. –MuZemike 19:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed, but all of these are already blocked and the IP checkuser-blocked. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Updated tags appropriately. -- DQ (t) (e) 13:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
29 August 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky [edit]

As before, has been editing only Ming Dynasty-related articles again. This IP address was indeed used by the sockpuppeteer a month ago. As the block has been lifted, he's probably using this IP address again to edit articles. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 04:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]

We really need a range block, there are several new socks weekly. We've had range blocks before and they've made a big difference. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 19:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

 Clerk note: moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/113.161.226.163. Elockid (Talk) 17:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk endorsed for a sleeper check. The primary range seems to be 113.161.226.0/24. There doesn't appear to be any other IP edits on that range. Can a rangeblock be in order? Elockid (Talk) 17:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note In the meanwhile Võ Trường Trà My blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 18:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Võ Trường Trà My  Confirmed plus:

Also, underlying IP range hardblocked 3 months. –MuZemike 04:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note All blocked and tagged. TNXMan 11:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
17 September 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky [edit]

Similar user pages, as seen here and here. I suspect User:Prince of Yan is a sockpuppet of User:Yongle the Great, as both of them have similar editing histories (i.e. editing Ming Dynasty related articles) and have been applying similar changes to the same articles (see Yan Song (Ming Dynasty) and History of the Ming Dynasty)). I'm not sure if User:历史研究 is also a sockpuppet, but I believe that CheckUser can help in determining if it is so. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 15:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To add on, the royalty username hints that this is one of User:Yongle the Great's sockpuppets, since Yongle has a habit of using names of emperors, royalty and nobility as the usernames for his sockpuppets. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 15:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

 Clerk note: Moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince of Yan and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/历史研究. Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 16:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk endorsed Looks like Yongle. Their IP has been hardblocked so it's possible they've moved to a new range. Also, previous checks found other accounts. Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 16:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Checkuser note: User:历史研究 and User:Prince of Yan are  Unlikely to be the same user. Given length of time and IP range block, connecting User:Yongle the Great and the new accounts appears to be a non-CU task.  Frank  |  talk  01:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The identical user page is enough for a block IMO, the checkuser results notwithstanding. Both blocked and tagged. T. Canens (talk) 05:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
24 September 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky [edit]

As before, editing Ming Dynasty related articles, not using edit summaries. CheckUser should be able to confirm if this is a sockpuppet. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 13:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

 Clerk note: Moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Bronze Horseman. Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 13:53, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk declined:  Looks like a duck to me. Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 13:54, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note The Bronze Horseman blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 22:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

17 October 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky [edit]

His editing history and behavior explains it all. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 09:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

 Confirmed

are the same as Prince of Yan (talk · contribs), who was previously blocked as a sock. This case needs to be merged to Yongle the Great's archive. TNXMan 13:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

19 October 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Dougweller [edit]

edit pattern, IP geolocation, other socks just blocked Dougweller (talk) 10:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

 Confirmed. No comment on the IP. TNXMan 11:52, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • information Administrator note All accounts blocked. I've warned the IP; block if the editing continues. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
13 November 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Lonelydarksky [edit]

As before, has been editing Ming Dynasty related articles. Has the same habit of blanking sections and not providing edit summaries. Uses another royalty username. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 05:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Auto-generated every six hours.

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
  •  Clerk endorsed - This one is obvious but it could use a check because of the possibly of more (prior sock history). Bsadowski1 06:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed the following are the same:
26 November 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

articles being edited, edits, lack of edit summary, and the '360' in the name, which he's used before. Dougweller (talk) 06:22, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed along with

Underlying range blocked for a good while. –MuZemike 06:55, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

17 December 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Suspected to be a sockpuppet of banned User:Yongle the Great. Although this time he has diverted slightly away from editing Ming Dynasty-related articles, some of the edits he makes are linked to the Ming Dynasty and Vietnamese history. This time, he uses the name of Zhang Wuji, a fictional character from a wuxia novel as his username. Previously, the sockpuppeteer used Tie Mole, the name of another wuxia novel character, as his username. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 14:47, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
22 December 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Editing Ming Dynasty related articles again. Has been using quite unusual usernames, usually related to Chinese history and culture, as typical of Yongle the Great's previous sockpuppets. Making a (poor) attempt to disguise his identity by creating a userpage on communism, just like his previous sockpuppet User:How the Steel Was Tempered. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 09:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One interesting point to note is that he created this account on 19 December, two days after his last two sockpuppets (see bottom of the archive page) were blocked on 17 December, and yet he only started editing three days later on 22 December. Would it be advisable to use Checkuser on routine to check for sockpuppet accounts that he created but not started using yet? Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 10:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Another (pathetic) attempt to divert attention. Please look at his contributions log. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 10:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account was also created on 19 December, and he only started using it on 22 December. Wonder how many more sockpuppets are out there? Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 10:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed the following are the same:

All accounts blocked. Nakon 16:49, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

01 January 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

(to 113.161.226.173): Untimely appearance. Been editing Ming Dynasty in a pattern similar to the sockpuppeteer. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 04:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(to Qigai Huangdi): Untimely appearance. Username gives him away. Qigai Huangdi means "Beggar Emperor", a reference to the Hongwu Emperor. Sockpuppeteer previously used usernames based on Hongwu and other nobility. Trying to divert attention by editing Song Dynasty related articles. CheckUser should be able to confirm if he's a sockpuppet. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 04:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(to Chow Wai-on): Possibly another sockpuppet. CheckUser will be able to confirm. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 04:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(to 222.128.176.244): Editing Ming Dynasty related articles. CheckUser will be able to confirm. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 04:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Thanks to everyone. This user is a real pain and takes up a lot of other people's time. Dougweller (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

This one is  Inconclusive;

- Alison ❤ 07:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
12 January 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

at Yunnan, exhibits the same removal of the phrasing "Ming conquest of Yunnan" as other socks have done. See [1] and [2]. Also, like the other socks, does not give rationale for removal, instead labelling the edits as "cleanup". HXL's Roundtable, and Record 05:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Can we have a rangeblock on this sockpuppeteer? There're sockpuppets popping up every now and then over a long period of time. And thanks to User:HXL49 for reporting him. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 14:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
19 January 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Suspected to be, even though there's insufficient evidence to say WP:DUCK. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 14:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
The two are Red X Unrelated. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: closing; no further action needed, SpitfireTally-ho! 15:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


23 January 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Editing Chinese history related articles again in a manner similar to his previous sockpuppets. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 02:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

I have combined the previously added SPI request templates to one section. --Bsadowski1 03:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the users Kokusenya Kassen (talk · contribs), H807 (talk · contribs), Zhong Yuan (talk · contribs), EdmundtheJust (talk · contribs), Peter116 (talk · contribs), For Aslan! (talk · contribs) and HeraclesofAthens (talk · contribs) are  Technically indistinguishable, tagged and blocked. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 12:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
16 February 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Account created recently (15 February 2011). Has the same habit of removing references in the process of making drastic changes. Not sure if it's a sockpuppet, but there's a chance it may be. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
26 February 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Similar edit summaries. Untimely appearance. CheckUser should be able to confirm his identity. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 08:43, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

information Administrator note KhaganoftheWorld blocked and tagged. Fukumatsu tagged. Elockid (Talk) 15:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

04 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Deviates from his usual pattern, but still retains certain characteristics, such as his obsession with Ming Dynasty related articles. How often do we get a new editor (account created on 4 March 2011 at 00:27) who can create a new article of quality as such on a first attempt? It's likely that this is somebody who's quite familiar with Wikipedia. I believe CheckUser can clarify whether this is a sockpuppet or not. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
09 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Editing Chinese history articles. Similar edit summaries and same habit of blanking. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected to be. Editing Chinese history related articles again. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
11 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Suspected to be, as this IP editor touches on similar topics as the sockpuppeteer. CheckUser should be able to confirm. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Unfortunately, checkuser generally does not disclose links between IP addresses and users. TNXMan 14:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

13 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

This account has already been blocked. I recommend using CheckUser to check for sleepers. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 04:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • I already checked this, no sleepers found. Tiptoety talk 04:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
18 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Suspected to be a sockpuppet. I suggest using CheckUser to check for sleepers. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Likely TNXMan 13:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

19 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Already blocked, but I'm reporting to SPI for a check for sleepers. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 06:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

I checked the last known sock and there are no sleepers there. TNXMan 13:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

26 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Editing Chinese history related articles again, especially on the Ming Dynasty. Username is a reference to Emperor Wen of Han. Sockpuppeteer has a habit of using the names of historical rulers and royalty as his usernames. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 07:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have combined these three reports into one for ease of reading. Dominic·t 12:48, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

information Administrator note All named accounts blocked and tagged. Additionally, I have blocked 116.109.172.0/24 for 1 month. Elockid (Talk) 13:10, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

01 April 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Editing Kingdom of Tungning, applying similar edits as previous sockpuppets. Requesting CheckUser to confirm identity. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

No check performed, but blocked as a duck. TNXMan 15:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Additionally, 123.23.240.0/20 reblocked for 1 month. Elockid (Talk) 19:11, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

08 April 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Using the name of a character from a wuxia novel as his username. Editing similar pages as sockpuppeteer (i.e. Ming Dynasty related articles). I suggest using CheckUser to confirm his identity. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed, plus

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 19:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

24 April 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Editing Ming Dynasty related articles. Using similar edit summaries. CheckUser should be able to confirm his identity. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 04:02, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly another sockpuppet. Just reporting it, in case. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 04:07, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


I know the ones above have been checked, but Ramsès le Grand (talk · contribs) has a typical Yongle the Great sock name and is making similar edits. Dougweller (talk) 06:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 In progress. Dominic·t 10:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

06 May 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Quite self-evident from his editing pattern and habits. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 02:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
07 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

This guy is deleting exactly the same information from the Ming dynasty article which Yongle The Great's other sockpuppets keep deleting

He is obsessed with deleting massive sections that relate to Muslims on the Ming dynasty article, specifically on the Salar people, the Ming conquest of Yunnan, and Turpan

previously, his other confirmed socks showed the same obsession-

ΔΥΝΓΑΝΕ (talk) 21:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also one of his previously confirmed and blocked socks, User:Lenin88 has a similar username and editing habits-

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Likely. It seems like it took him a while to get around Luk's rangeblock from last time, perhaps I can put another down as well. TNXMan 22:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yongle_the_Great/Archive&oldid=1084292617"