Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish kalathil/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Sathish kalathil

Sathish kalathil (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
02 August 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Main was blocked for self-promotion. Sock appealed via UTRS as autoblocked. They clearly edit on the same topic - this guy's film. It's a clear sock - worth seeing if there are any more? Secretlondon (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the sock is older than the main. They have a spam page on commons User:Jalachhayam_Feature_Film and another account on commons User:Sathish_kalathil Secretlondon (talk) 05:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Another User:Sathish kalathil Secretlondon (talk) 05:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Another User:Sathish_Kalathil_(Film_Director) Secretlondon (talk) 06:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • Moved case name to oldest master and blocked socks indef and tagged.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

29 April 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Both uploaded same image, [1] and used, in the permissions section of that file, a website similar in name to a sockpuppet of them: User:Jalachhayam Feature Film RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 02:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • It's not the same image, just the same title. I'm not convinced, so I'm closing this with no action. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]