Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lorielpid/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Lorielpid

Lorielpid (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
25 November 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Persistent disruption across a range of articles, some broadly connected eg. freedom to roam v's road taxation theme;

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Here is a few others:

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  •  Clerk note: I'm closing this case for now. Most of the IPs listed have been blocked as being open proxies. And a bunch of the articles involved have been protected. If the issue arises again, list here. For open proxies, they can be reported elsewhere to be closed up. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

30 November 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Following the previous case, it seems a new editor has shown up and has been editing in the same space as the IPs that were listed before, as well as harassing the editor who opened the other case. This may be Lorielpid, or it may be someone else; either way, something weird is going on here. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Unfortunately, technical data won't be of much use here, as this editor was editing behind proxies. If they resume editing, please refile - we may be able to get a bead on it then. TNXMan 19:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Edit conflict - we were apparently checking this at the same time.) I'm going to call this  Likely; the useragent is identical, however the IPs being used are geolocating all over the place. Several are being flagged as "suspected network sharing devices", so I strongly suspect they're using open proxies to avoid blocks and detection. I'll go confirm and block the proxies, but in the meantime, blocks can likely be issued to both users. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Both editors blocked. Nakon 20:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Administrator note I was just informed on my talk page of another IP, and it's been blocked too. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 20:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]