Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ildivino1010

Ildivino1010

Ildivino1010 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ildivino1010/Archive.

13 April 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Gairathimonikagairathi (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

I know that Ildivino1010 was previously checked and dismissed, but as the other socks editing Draft:Stiven Mikhail are all bunched together here, I'll add this new one also. Gairathimonikagairathi is a SPA, only interested in the Mikhail draft, which seems ducky given its edit history. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ponyo, I was aiming to connect Gairathimonikagairathi directly to Ildivino1010. Both are recently active, and both are editing this Stiven Mikhail draft. From the archive it looks like a CU was run in Aug-23, but Gairathimonikagairathi was only registered a month later, so wouldn't have been included in that. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

@DoubleGrazing: Are you looking to tie Gairathimonikagairathi to the group of socks blocked in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ildivino1010/Archive? If so, the accounts are extremely Stale.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gairathimonikagairathi is Confirmed to Rathorenareshrathore and is an obvious UPE spammer; I've blocked both accounts. Ildivino1010 is open about who they are and, while there is a conflict of interest involved, there is no technical or behavioural evidence to contradict their story. They are completely Unrelated technically to the spam groups hovering around this article trying to collect a pay cheque.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]