Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DBSSURFER/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


DBSSURFER

DBSSURFER (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
26 January 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

As indicated on User talk:Seaboy123, in this edit, user was blocked for edits pertaining to claims about Buddha's birthplace. This correlates to User:DBSSURFER, who claimed in response to his block that he would "continue doing this and even from different users until you guys are disciplined". The editing style, articles edited, and threats of reporting those with whom he disagrees are identical. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 18:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

The two accounts are  Confirmed matches to each other. TNXMan 19:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


04 April 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


This user was brought to my attention on my talk page, and after checking through the contribution histories I think there's enough here to merit a check. This user has a very similar editing history and..."style"...to two indef-blocked users: User:RealCowboys and User:Seaboy123, especially on the Football records in Spain article, and with rather vehement accusations that editors who disagree with them are supporters of Barcelona F.C. (RealCowboys: "Anyone else think he's a [Barcelona] bandwagoner?"; Seaboy: "This article is poorly biased towards barcelona"; Amarru: "Once again vandalism by Barcelona fan"). There's enough differences that the quacking is fairly faint, but enough similarities that I believe there should be a check done; as noted, there's similarities to both indef'd editors, but there's slightly more similarities to Seaboy123, IMHO, so I've filed it under the same case as his, although both should likely be checked. The Bushranger One ping only 00:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Socks are already blocked. Nothing more to do here. Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

08 June 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

I have reason to believe that User:HunterSilver is a sockpuppet of User:HasperHunter, who was banned indefinitely on April 20, 2012 for abusing multiple accounts. I have these doubts because User:HunterSilver demonstrate the same, unconstructive behavior at List of Prime Ministers of Nepal as User:HasperHunter did some months ago. I hope this matter will be resolved quickly. Sundostund (talk) 13:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/DBSSURFER/Archive&oldid=1085549935"