Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aabrucadubraa/Archive
Aabrucadubraa
- Aabrucadubraa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
14 December 2013[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Aabrucadubraa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ClenserBlastAaa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Kmarinas86 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
A bunch of people that advocate the fringe theories of Ruggero Santilli on a variety of articles. The smoking gun evidence is this [1], where ClenserBlastAaa "sort of signs" as Aabrucadubraa. I'm listing Kmarinas86 because that username appears in the edit/quotes of Kmarinas86, but the edits Kmarinas86, while pro-Santilli could be independent, or a sign of WP:MEATPUPPETing. The timing of the edits is suspicious. IP behaviour is consistent with sockmaster.
As an aside, there's a load of blockable behaviour from these people, e.g. [2]. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 22:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Edit, apparently these may be related to ScientificEthics (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Um, I very much doubt that User:Kmarinas86 is anyones sock. Kmarinas86 has been a contributor since 2005. [3] AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- (Comment from uninvolved editor) Could be the other way around, User:Kmarinas86 could be controlling the other users. Epicgenius (talk) 23:27, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- There is nothing in Kmarinas86's posts that looks to me to be anything but this contributor taking a rather 'open' view of sourcing, and an over-sympathetic view of fringe material - something I've noticed him/her do elsewhere. Certainly Kmarinas86 isn't repeating any of the obnoxious antisemitism and general conspiracy-mongering that the socks are spewing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. Kmarinas86 is very unlikely to be involved in this socking. But I'd already added the 2 accounts to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zkurko. I now see these 2 editors are identified as sock at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ScientificEthics/Archive. Dougweller (talk) 06:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- There is nothing in Kmarinas86's posts that looks to me to be anything but this contributor taking a rather 'open' view of sourcing, and an over-sympathetic view of fringe material - something I've noticed him/her do elsewhere. Certainly Kmarinas86 isn't repeating any of the obnoxious antisemitism and general conspiracy-mongering that the socks are spewing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
- Please note Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ScientificEthics. --Rschen7754 03:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- ClenserBlastAaa admits that he is Aabrucadubraa, and CU results only confirm that. I ran the check for making sure there were no sleepers. Kmarinas86 was not checked and did not come up in results. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:07, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Aabrucadubraa and ClenserBlastAaa are blocked indef. Nothing else to do here. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:09, 24 December 2013 (UTC)