Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/0Juan234/Archive

0Juan234

0Juan234 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

14 October 2013[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Blander2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

1. Accounts created within about 6 weeks of each other, both with obvious prior Wikipedia editing experience. 2. Both accounts edit topics of similar subject matter: Latino-American, American literature, Florida Keys (but not same articles except Nathaniel Raymond). Very low overall number of edits. 0Juan234 & Blander2 3. Both accounts involved in a lop-sided AfD with only these two accounts versus everyone else.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Raymond. 4. Typical angry/defensive response of a sock when confronted with evidence ~~("You might want to learn a little before spouting off like a disruptive little gnat with such an absurd claim."[1]).~~ ("Blander2 is my roommate you idiot.")[2]5. Both accounts overlap edits on the same days (overlap is October 7 and October 14 = 100% overlap of sockpuppet with master, see links in 2 above). Green Cardamom (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See also related Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ColonelHenry -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

1. Accounts created within about 6 weeks of each other, both with obvious prior Wikipedia editing experience.

I guess there should be an account made every seven weeks at wikipedia.

2. Both accounts edit topics of similar subject matter: Latino-American, American literature, Florida Keys (but not same articles except Nathaniel Raymond). Very low overall number of edits. 0Juan234 & Blander2

Blander is my roommate you idiot. You think we don't have the same interests?

Do you use the same computer? -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3. Both accounts involved in a lop-sided AfD with only these two accounts versus everyone else.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Raymond.

There are lots of people who think the Raymond page is a vanity piece. Look at the talk page over there.

4. Typical angry/defensive response of a sock when confronted with evidence ("You might want to learn a little before spouting off like a disruptive little gnat with such an absurd claim."[1]).

That quote was made by someone else. I was citing him/her in regard to how silly a comment it is/was.

Right, fixed. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

5. Both accounts overlap edits on the same days (overlap is October 7 and October 14 = 100% overlap of sockpuppet with master, see links in 2 above).

I guess we should not use the computer at the same time any more? Would that be acceptable? So, this has been an enormous waste of time. Good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0Juan234 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This investigation is a WP:POINT response to people being asked to provide reasons why they think that the Raymond page is/is not notable.0Juan234 (talk) 21:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

There is a Confirmed technical overlap between 0Juan234 (talk · contribs) and Blander2 (talk · contribs). If they are not the same person, they are using the same computer to make the same arguments at the AfD. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked master 1 week, sock indef. Please see WP:BROTHER Rs chen 7754 21:43, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Double checked, blocked a number of sleepers as well. Jclemens (talk) 04:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]