Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 September 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< 2010 September 2 2010 September 3 2010 September 4 >

Brian Rutenberg[edit]

Zwylazee (talk) 02:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is well written, but I would suggest a longer lead as the article is somewhat long. Obiviously, you should add more references aswell as their are very few as it is, I would suggest you use {{Cite web}} and {{Cite news}} templates as these are good templates to lay out your references correctly. At the start of early life it says "Brian Rutenberg was born on September 18" Where is the year? I hope this advice is useful to you and when you get these sorted, I would suggest you take it to WP:PR for a more detailed review. Mr.Kennedy1 talk guestbook 18:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mr.Kennedy1/Sandbox/Mark Robinson (darts player)[edit]

Could someone please leave feedback for this article so I know what to do before I put it live. Thanks.


Mr.Kennedy1 talk guestbook 17:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weil-Felix test[edit]

My first major rewrite of an article. I reorganized the material that was previously present, but left out a table that wasn't verified or cited, (and as far as I can tell, accurate). Also added most of the bulk of the article itself. Wasn't sure if my formatting or conventions were proper or appropriate. Feedback appreciated, thanks!

Pseudallescheria (talk) 22:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The lede is too short, and confusing for the layman; please try to describe what it is in more lay-terms. It might help a bit to to wikilink differently, e.g. instead of The Weil-Felix test is an agglutination test for the diagnosis of rickettsial infections. try The Weil-Felix test is an agglutination test for the diagnosis of rickettsial infections. - thus explaining the terms most people won't know. Most people will know 'infection'.
  • In addition, you could rephrase it, adding a few choice words, to make it more readable to the non-expert. Now - I don't know the topic so please forgive these examples for being 'wrong', but I'm merely trying to illustrate the concept; The Foo-Baa test is a medical procedure which is used to find problems in patients blood or The Baz test identifies certain types of bacteria from the Rickettsia species in human patients.
  • The lede is supposed to be a summary of the whole article - therefore it shouldn't contain any information that isn't elaborated upon later. A useful technique is, to write the lede last, and simply pick out the key points from each paragraph in the body, writing a short sentence on each. For an article of this length, the lede should be a couple of paragraphs. A non-expert reader should be able to read the lede and get the gist of the whole thing, without reading the details in the article, if you see what I mean; thus, you can 'get away with' somewhat more technical language in the body text, but try to keep the lede simple.
  • It needs more references. You need at least one per paragraph, and preferably one for each sentence. Currently, some of it looks a bit like original research, because we cannot verify the information. largely been supplanted by other methods of serology[according to whom?] including indirect immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) testing, which is the gold standard.[neutrality is disputed] However, in resource-limited settings, it still remains an important tool[according to whom?]
  • The two methods certainly could use a reference to examples in books or something.
  • As articles improve in quality, notice how they have more and more references; please have a quick look at a few Good Articles (in terms of how well-referenced they are), and then look at some featured articles. It's all about references, really.
  • Technical formatting-wise, it's not bad; I just tweaked some bits;
  • References should come after punctuation characters, not before,
  • Units of measure need a 'non-breaking space' between the number and the unit,
  • You don't need a blank line after a == Section heading ==
All of those should hopefully be clear in this diff (at least, they will be if you enable wikEdDiff)
  • Some pics/illustrations/diagrams would be nice

Hope that helps a bit, cheers,  Chzz  ►  23:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daveszt/HeyUGuys[edit]

Hello,

This is my first article. I think i've done all that is required. I'm not sure I've added the logo in correctly. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

Dave


Daveszt (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would require more references to show that it is 'notable' - most blog/websites do not meet the notability requirements; please see WP:VRS and WP:WEB.
To get the logo to work, you'd have to upload it to Wikipedia. However, we can only use non-free logos on actual live articles, so you need to sort out the notability first; if it can be made live, then you should ask for help with uploading a logo. Best,  Chzz  ►  00:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siobhan_Owen[edit]

Please review the Siobhan Owen wiki. Siobhan is a Classical/Celtic singer & harpist from Australia (originally Wales). Thank you

59.101.146.152 (talk) 23:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2010_September_3&oldid=383354957"