Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 August 20
National Waterway 4 (India) - Review / View Pls[edit]
Done >>Reviewed & Assessed by Raptor & Sodabottle
Hi Wikipedians,
Just posted an Article titled National Waterway 4. Pls have a look at the article and provide your valuable feedback. ----Raj 6644(தமிழன்) 05:10, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
ResolvedArticle was already deleted by Admin:Gogo Dodo on the grounds of G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion). Deletion log can found at the Article page ---Raj 6644(தமிழன்) 07:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Nanzad (talk) 05:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Updated Categories and added valid links to the article.
Sumeet.chhetri (talk) 06:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
General Feedback expected...
Thank you guys!!! Sumeet.chhetri (talk) 07:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Little better than spam. No evidence the the product exists, let alone that it is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Article is already proposed for deletion by User:RHaworth on grounds of no evidence of notability,apart from that I came to know that the article is nothing but a Self Promotion / Advertisement of Author. User Name is User:Sumeet.chhetri; contents of the articles refers to User:Sumeet (It is developed by Sumeet Chhetri and hosted on Google Code). With the following evidence the article is hereby strongly recommended for deletion.----Raj 6644(தமிழன்) 08:38, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
I would like someone to review my article before I submit it for live acceptance. Thank you in advance.
Rhodesfs (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Try and add some names to those references and external link, like this:
Example sentence <ref>[http://www.exampleURL.com/article|Reference name goes here!]</ref>.
Also, I think the article's tone needs to be worked on, as it sounds like an advertisement for the company in places. For more information, take a look at WP:CITE. Thanks. Chevymontecarlo 08:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
A new page about Digimap, a service used by UK Universities to access digital mapping data for the UK. Any feedback is most welcome, thanks.
RockMapper (talk) 14:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds and looks notable, judging by your good work with the references and correct formatting. Well done! Chevymontecarlo 08:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Su de2002 (talk) 14:59, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think the article's formatting style is the number one thing you need to work on with this article. Instead of using bold font and straight dividing lines for your sections, please try and use proper section headers, like this:
==Early life==
which creates a section with 'early life' as the name. The second thing you need to work on is adding links to the article, and suitable references, preferably using Inline citations to display them correctly. Thank you. Chevymontecarlo 08:33, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Looking to for page validation and feedback, thanks.
97.84.15.1 (talk) 15:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- For an article in Wikipedia to be reliable, notable, and verifiable, you need reliable sources. Presently, the article only contains 2 sources and that is insufficient. There are large parts of the article that is still unsourced. For example,
- Electronic human resources (E-HR) is a function of HR that is concerned with the use, management, and regulation of electronic information and processes within an organization.
- Use refers to the implementation and interaction with technology in the workforce. E-HR focuses on using technology to increase productivity, security, and sustainability within an organization. Some examples that illustrate human resources use of technology include HRIS and E-HRM. Use also includes other technological advances applied to human resource needs such as telepresence and RFID systems.
- and many others. Please get them sourced.
Greetings Editors,
Please review my article to ensure that it follows the proper format/regulations of the wikipedia standard. The article reads on QA Technologies, a telematics firm based in Saskatoon Saskatchewan.
Advance thanks on helping me see the completion of my article.Pardon my Wikipedia learning curve while submitting.
Suzy Huber (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- The article could do with an infobox just to summarise the key points of the article. Chevymontecarlo 08:38, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
Can you please tell me why this page is under review for not being notable? Also what could I do improve the article to meet these standards. Thank you for all of you input. I am a fairly new user all links or information would help.
MikeSweeneyMV (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, any help with formatting would be appreciated. ---NRRI (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- I have Formatted / Copy edited your article to the possible extend. It seems mostly you have copy pasted most of the contents from Monthly Report of NRRI. Please avoid direct copying of words. Apart from that its a nice effort from you. Referring some Featured Articles like World Trade Center will help you write better articles. You also can refer WP:References for citation of the contents.Have a look at similar articles on Research Institutes which will give better idea on how to write article on Research Institute. For any help, you can contact me at talkpage or WP:helpdesk. Have a nice day! ----Raj 6644(தமிழன்) 07:05, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I justed wanted my article to be reviewed.