Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ceraurus

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ceraurus}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Ceraurus

Explanation of the request for CheckUser. Pete Peters 17:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ceraurus account was banned indefinitely on 20 May 2006. A new account by the name Arthur Ellis emerged on the 23 May 2006.

Arthur Ellis is the only account to defend Ceraurus on Ceraurus user talk page.[1] In fact Arthur Ellis’s first entry was on Ceraurus user talk page.[2]

Arthur Ellis and Ceraurus are the only two accounts that have made edits regarding Rachel Marsden, Mark Bourrie, and Warren Kinsella.

Ceraurus is User:Mark Bourrie, and should not be allowed to dominate the Warren Kinsella's Wikipedia entry. The two don’t like each other, and in the past Mr. Kinsella has filed suit against Mr. Bourrie.

I am hoping that Arthur Ellis is proven to be a sock puppet of Ceraurus. I am also hoping that he not be allowed to ever again to dominate Wikipedia entries, like he has done in the past.

I am not User:Mark Bourrie or Ceraurus. "Pete Peters" is a new account set up to stalk and attempt to out me. Pls. check his poostings and block account for vandalismArthur Ellis 21:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined Mackensen (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see mark bourrie has posted a letter he recieved from a lawyer on one of his blogs. Please read it here. I think you can agree that the burden of proof is that Ceraurus and Arthur Ellis are the same person. And since Ceraurus is banned indefenitely, so should Arthur Ellis.

In the letter from the lawyer, Mark Bourrie is clearly identified as Ceraurus, Isotelus, and Arthur Ellis. Also in the noinclude section, someone has dug up the fact that Ceraurus has already been booked for being Isotelus. Pete Peters 01:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to add that it was suggested to me by an administrator CrazyRussian to resubmit a check user request. Pete Peters 13:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay this getting out of control. Under the Category Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ceraurus, one of the users is now modifying the entry of Pierre Bourque. One of his supsected sockpuppets IP 64.26.170.91 said, " Fuck you. My IP changes every six hours. I'll be back. I will cause as much Wikipedia trouble as I can!" On his own user page, please see 64.26.170.91 for evidence. Can you please do something soon? I am not reverting his edits anymore, as it is a fruitless effort, I feel that I can only ask the Wikipedia authorities to take action. Pete Peters 16:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have IP 64.26.170.91 and this complaint is groundless. It has already been declined once. The complainant has done nothing but vandalize and harrass since he registered four days ago. I may have been called a sockpuppet in some lawyers' letter, but it is not true and I suspect the accusation, as usual, begins with new Wikipedian Pete Peters. Arthur Ellis 23:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I suggested to Arthur Ellis that he volunteer for a checkuser he responeded by saying, "Am I supposed to be harrassed until I volunteer for one? Until I have to out myself?"[[3]] This response leads me to believe that he is infact Ceraurus. Why is he afraid of being "outted" unless he is Ceraurus Geedubber 05:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, who is Geedubber? Why should I contribute to a harrassment campaign? The Checkuser stuff has been done. Live with it. Arthur Ellis 22:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk assistance required: I'm not sure if it's the lateness, or my lingering sadness over the Tigers losing 9-2 this evening, but I'm having real trouble figuring out who's accusing whom of what here. Mackensen (talk) 03:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[Here] is a recent personal attack made by Arthur Ellis.Pete Peters 03:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Currently compiling report on this request. Kevin_b_er 04:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Having reviewed the summary, the question here appears to be whether Arthur Ellis is a sockpuppet of Ceraurus. The results in that regard are  Inconclusive. Regarding the IP addresses, that information is privileged. Mackensen (talk) 12:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.




The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Isotelus (talk · contribs) and Mark Bourrie (talk · contribs)

Agreed. I would also suggest keeping an eye on 70.25.91.205. One entry dated February 25th is even signed "MB". Wiederaufbau 16:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Bourrie (talk · contribs) has now changed his name to Ceraurus (talk · contribs). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bucketsofg (talk • contribs) 01:42, 8 March 2006
It is difficult to keep track of his frequent username changes, hopefully someone with CheckUser privileges will be able to assist us relatively soon. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Isotelus and User:Mark Bourrie are of course the same person, editing from IPs 70.25.91.205 and 70.50.101.218. No other socks found. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 07:30, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Ceraurus&oldid=1080977032"