Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Beh-nam

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Beh-nam}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Beh-nam (9 December 2008)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 9 December 2008

Submitted by Kingturtle (talk) 19:49, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed, IP range blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 23:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your swift action in this matter. Kingturtle (talk) 02:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (8 November 2008)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 8 November 2008

Submitted by Kingturtle (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • 01:18, 13 November 2008 Nishkid64 (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Pashtoone (Talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Beh-nam.)

Beh-nam (29 September 2008)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 15:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

this edit is the same as the ones done by User:PashtoonEditor[1][2], who was indef-blocked as a sock of Beh-nam.

User:Ikearode per WP:DUCK, this edit is the same as above

Some of them could be socks of User:NisarKand --Enric Naval (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PashtunNaswari (talk · contribs) is  Confirmed as being a Beh-nam sock.
Ikearode (talk · contribs) is  Confirmed as being a Nisarkand sock.
- I wish both of them would stop this nonsense - Alison ❤ 18:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
tagged... -- lucasbfr talk 18:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (14 July 2008)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 14 July 2008
[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] (compare with [9]), [10]. Or it could be NisarKand. I'll put this over there too. Kingturtle (talk) 05:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed as Beh-nam again, of course. The rangeblocks seem to be helping, though, and I'm starting to collect information for the next rangeblock. Same for NisarKand, also - Alison ❤ 08:44, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: blocked and tagged. Tiptoety talk 02:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (7 July 2008)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 7 July 2008
[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. etc. Kingturtle (talk) 18:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[19], [20], [21]. Kingturtle (talk) 18:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm calling this  Likely based on geo location, behaviour and certain checkuser evidence. However, this is not Beh-nam's usual ISP and I suspect this may have been changed due to the recent rangeblocks. If this persists, however, this range should be pretty-easy to lock down without damage to others.
  1. ZhongguoYen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. RodneySmithJr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
QualityEditor (talk · contribs) is also  Likely as this account uses a Shared IP from a location close to Beh-nam and the edit history tends to support this. Per the level of abuse and per the fact that he's logging out to evade detection, I'm disclosing this IP to be
  1. 192.30.202.21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- Alison ❤ 19:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: all accounts blocked indef and IP softblocked for 24 hours by Kingturtle. Tiptoety talk 02:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (27 June 2008)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 27 June 2008
Edits to Hazara people.
[22] and [23].

Kingturtle (talk) 17:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed, obviously. CanuckAnthropologist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), too. Sam Korn (smoddy) 22:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: blocked and tagged. Tiptoety talk 23:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Bureaucrat note: - Does that include User:Inshalla? Kingturtle (talk) 12:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Sam Korn (smoddy) 13:05, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, I did not see that one down there ;) Tiptoety talk 19:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (21 June 2008)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 26 May 2008

Has been restoring edits Beh-nam made using IP's. - dwc lr (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - I'm also investigating another possible IP rangeblock - Alison ❤ 20:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Beh-nam 15

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 26 May 2008

Blueboy96 03:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - Beh-nam, of course. Also Persian1747 (talk · contribs) - Alison ❤ 03:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
...And blocked. Tiptoety talk 03:42, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Beh-nam 14

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 17 May 2008

Kingturtle (talk) 05:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - Beh-nam again - Alison ❤ 06:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: blocked by KT. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Beh-nam 13th

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 8 May 2008
 Confirmed - the following very obvious Beh-nam socks:
  1. PashtoonBoy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. SwatiAfridi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. KarzaiIsStillATaliban (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. ThePashtoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. KyleSmithX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  6. DuvarnGreen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  7. Tajik007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
 Confirmed - as socks of NisarKand (talk), the following:
  1. Al-Afghan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Jiramsexo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Altristo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. Benson Jefferson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. Biradar Khan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Alison ❤ 08:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: All blocked and tagged. Tiptoety talk 22:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 08:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

CyrusTheGreat2 started an editwar on Afghanistan and made the same types of edits as multiply sockpupping and banned user Beh-nam. henrik•talk 08:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - Beh-nam, as usual. Also the following:
  1. Farsiwan1979 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Alison ❤ 18:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Both tagged and blocked. henrik•talk 19:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Beh-nam (2008-04-26)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 00:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Beh-nam is a banned user. It looks pretty obvious like this is a sock, but I wanted to make sure. --B (talk) 00:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - Beh-nam again - Alison ❤ 00:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (2008-03-21)

Also, at Nasrat Parsa, Anoshirawan had an edit war with User:Historian born 1975, a puppet of User:NisarKand.

I've run out of time today to do anymore research on this. Kingturtle (talk) 14:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Supporting evidence: Check the edits made by a sock to Beh-nam, DoctorLeeOnWiki and the edits made by Anoshirawan, they look pretty similar. Momusufan (talk) 15:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Supporting evidence: Looking at the edit history for Mohammad Zahir Shah, you can see obvious similarities in edits by Anoshirawan (talk · contribs) and Beh-nam (talk · contribs)'s socks. The same goes for Kabul University, Hotaki, and various other articles concerning Afghan history. They both push the term "Afghanistani", and they both claim that Afghanistan "didn't exist until the 19th century", and insist on changing "Afghanistan" to "Khorasan", "Greater Khorasan", "Greater Iran", etc. This is a complete departure from all other editors, except banned Tajik (talk · contribs). They all coordinate their activities on one another's talk pages as well.
Version constantly restored by Beh-nam (talk · contribs)'s socks: [[24]]
Version constantly restored by Anoshirawan (talk · contribs)'s socks: [[25]]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by EduardoGuerez (talk • contribs)

  • Supporting evidence: 65.93.219.52 has an interest in and is making the same edits to the Silvia Lancome‎ article as previous Beh-nam accounts have done. Is familiar and is communicating with Anoshirawan telling them not to edit war [26]. - dwc lr (talk) 20:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Supporting evidence: 65.93.219.52 has admitted to being Beh-nam [27] - dwc lr (talk) 20:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anoshirawan is Red X Unrelated unless his networking cable is 3000 miles long. Thatcher 22:51, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Beh-nam (2008-03-18)

P.S. Is there any way we can strengthen the ban on Beh-nam? Kingturtle (talk) 22:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC) P.P.S. I have blocked DoctorLeeOnWiki temporarily for edit warring. Kingturtle (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Rather pointless to keep posting checks, almost, since you keep spotting them so fast. We can try a rangeblock but it may be impractical for various reasons. Thatcher 22:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pain posting each puppet to this request page, but don't feel right infinite-banning sockpuppets without a checkuser confirmation. By the way, thank you for acting so quickly on this. Kingturtle (talk) 23:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: tagged and blocked indef. -- lucasbfr talk 09:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (2008-03-17)

This and is using the IP to make the same edit like This. Momusufan (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Supporting evidence: Barakzai is carrying out the exact same edits as two previously confirmed accounts Jalalabadi and DurraniPashtun at the Mohammed Zahir Shah article by reverting to an old version of the article and has the same objection to listing King of the God granted Kingdom of Afghanistan and its dependencies in the article as Jalalabadi. - dwc lr (talk) 23:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed - Beh-nam again. The following accounts:
  1. FCBarsalona (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Shinwarii (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Barakzai (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Alison ❤ 05:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: tagged and blocked. -- lucasbfr talk 09:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (2008-03-11)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 11 March 2008
 Confirmed - Beh-nam again, of course! Also, the following:
  1. Jalalabadi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. KonarPashtoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Alison ❤ 01:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (2008-02-29)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 10 March 2008
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 29 February 2008
 Confirmed, as ever, the following:
  1. TruePashtoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. DurraniPashtun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. KhostiPakhtoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Alison ❤ 05:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (2008-02-21)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 21 February 2008
 Confirmed and blocked - I'd caught this one earlier today in an unrelated check :) - Alison ❤ 05:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DurraniPashtun (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Pakhtuna (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
I'm absolutely sure these are also socks of Beh-nam, same style of edits and is editing same articles where Beh-nam's last sock left off.

Beh-nam (2008-02-19)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 01:10, 19 February 2008
 Clerk assistance requested: - can someone format this one properly for User:Kingturtle? Thanks - Alison ❤ 01:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: merged with Tajik, can't do really more than that. -- lucasbfr talk 09:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed - Beh-nam again -
  1. Khowsti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Helmanday (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Pashtuni (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. Herat-e-Bastan45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. GreekAnatolia314 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  6. Pashtoon123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  7. XiaouLee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  8. ChinezeGuy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Alison ❤ 05:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: all blocked and tagged appropriately. Spebi 06:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: - Spebi - you're awesome :) - Alison ❤ 06:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (2008-02-11)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 05:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Banned editor and anti-Afghan User:Beh-nam is now using the new sock accounts for edti-wars and violate many rules of Wikipedia. This distruptive user claims to be an ethnic Tajik and he is easily spotted because he shows the same ill feelings towards other ethnic groups by his messages or edits and is constantly pushing for Persian POVs in every article. He is labelling Pashtun cities as "gay cities" [46], with clear intentions. [47] He is currently eyeing on these articles: Ahmad Shah Durrani, Hotaki dynasty, Kandahar, Kabul and probably other Pashtun people related articles because it appears that he has a natural hate towards these people. I don't think haters such as him should be allowed to edit articles, especially articles relating to their rivals or opponents.--203.175.65.153 (talk) 05:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: - the editor filing this request is Khampalak / Nisarkand once again. I've applied a /24 rangeblock as it entirely used by them to edit-war with also-banned editor, Beh-nam - Alison ❤ 06:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed - the following:
  1. KandahariPashtoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. StevenAmericano (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. WashingtonGuy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. HuaijinYang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. JinlinZhao (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  6. KharotiPashtun1979 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  7. Ghazni5000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  8. Ghazni4000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  9. Multani Khan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  10. Kandahar-Pashtun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  11. SarbanFan1970 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  12. Behsud1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  13. SingerKabul (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  14. Pokhton (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
 Likely - SalesKeep77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
 Stale - Khoshalpashtun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Alison ❤ 06:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: All confirmed sock accounts have been blocked and tagged (those who weren't already). Spebi 06:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
banned editor Beh-nam is now using the following socks in the same articles where he left off with his blocked ones. The guy is so stupid he makes similar names always mentioning Pashtun or Pakhton in it, name of the ethnic group he wish to destroy.
  1. KhostiPakhtoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. PokhtonBoy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
 Confirmed - KhostiPakhtoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
 Possible - PokhtonBoy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Alison ❤ 01:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (2008-01-28)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 03:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The banned editor Beh-nam is using these new sock accounts to vandalise Afghanistan related articles. If you quickly look down the list here --->[48], you'll see that mostly all of the above listed socks are used by the same person which starts with "Beh-nam" and ends with his latest sock "Hazara898". He is best known for his similar edit-warring with Pashtuns and Turks, relating to ethnic issues. His favorite articles to vandalise are Afghanistan and Pashtun people.--203.175.65.169 (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - all of the above, per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tajik. Also Afghantarikh (talk · contribs) - Alison ❤ 00:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: All blocked and tagged, I went too fast on them this morning. -- lucasbfr talk 15:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beh-nam (2007-07-18)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 21:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: C

Both of these users are involved in same edit-war on the same articles, with same POVs. Beh-nam admitted that he knows user:Anoshirawan and deleted the suspected sockpuppet tag from Anoshirawan's front page.[49] I placed the tag there when Anoshirawan was not online, so how did Beh-nam knew I placed the tag there? If you look at both of the users' history, you will see that both are upto no good, disrupting and creating edit-war with other editors. They or the same person uses both names as a tag team so he doesn't violate the 3RR rule. These users are also vandalizing articles, by removing well sourced information and no administrator will stop them. for example, changing the internationally recognized name "Afghan" to "Afghanistani" in every article, after many people showed enough evidence that the only correct way to spell the name was "Afghan". They changed the article "Afghan American" to "Afghanistani American", which is incorrect according to Afghanistan's constitution, CIA Factbook, Webster's Dicitionary, and every other dictionary or book in the world. These users simply say that "Afghanistani" sounds better and should be used. These users or user has hijacked all Afghanistan related articles and are destroying them in front of our eyes but no administrator will do anything to even warn them. Rabeenaz 21:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Though it's not my place to say this, but this looks like a personal attack. Also, check the contribs of the guy who's requesting this, his first edit was on Anoshirawan's page putting the sock tag there. Kwsn(Ni!) 07:29, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's correct, I've placed the tag on Anoshirawan's page. I'm not an editor on Wikipedia, just an observer. The actions of Anoshirawan caught my attention and tried to report him here. I don't think that's illegal here.--Rabeenaz 16:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Beh-nam&oldid=1140161363"