Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ke5crz

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Ke5crz[edit]

Final (1/4/2); ended 04:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW - King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination[edit]

Ke5crz (talk · contribs) – My request for adminship is a request to help fight vandels and any unsourced content that may find it's way on to wikipedia. Ke5crz (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: Dealing with vandalism and any unsourced content.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: My best contribution was the pre-1984 bell wiki project.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: A user disagreed with some edits that i made while working on the wiki project. specifically he made a statement about the Category:Bell System (Pre-1984) and questioned why it should exist

General comments[edit]

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Discussion[edit]

  • Instead of piling on NOTNOW's, it'd be helpful if you provided this user with suggestions instead of 50 links to the NOTNOW page. Thanks. yes I realize I did the NOTNOW, but when I edited the page it had just been transcluded, probably the same for the other comments) --Addihockey10 e-mail 03:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support[edit]
  1. Moral support. You might want to read WP:NOTNOW, but you've done good work on the encyclopedia thus far. Keep it up, and if you have a need for sysop tools in a few months, come back and request again. Best of luck, Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Oppose[edit]
  1. Well, the good news is, you can deal with vandalism and unsourced content right now... you don't need special privileges for that. 28bytes (talk) 03:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, move to close. Last fifty edits stretch back four years. jorgenev 03:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. WP:NOTNOW, serious grammar/communication issues. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 04:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, would like to see a bit more experience. -- Cirt (talk) 04:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Write an article. This is an editorial venture full of content creation. If you haven't done any, then you just don't get it. This is NOT a video game for vandal wacking or a mysite for playing moderator and leveling up. TCO (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:AGF --The Σ talkcontribs 04:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
  1. Moral Support I am very very tempted to be bold and close this now before the parade of not now starts. I hope your not discouraged. --Guerillero | My Talk 03:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    You should supplement your anti vandalism work with some content editing. The ability to create a DYK or GA shows that a person has the grasp of many many policies. (I am dyslexic myself so this is the pot calling the kettle black) please please run a spell checker over your contributions. It will improve the first impression you give off. --Guerillero | My Talk 04:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral WP:NOTNOW - I've looked at your work, I have no reason to oppose, however, after a quick glance at your contributions, I've seen alot of contributions from VP, (Vandalism Patroller or something of that sort).
I've only been here since 2008, and have never used that tool, but it is not included in X's tools for automated edits, just thought I'd point that out. I'd suggest maybe branching out to other areas other than vandalism patrol. So far I've seen a long term user who just hasn't racked up enough edits to show their true dedication, don't get me wrong, I'm not infected by editcountitis, but if a user created no matter when, made 100 edits and RfA'd, we'd suggest more edits to make us more comfortable with giving this user the extra tools.
If you'd like me to suggest areas you'd might be interested in, I could mention some that I've been interested in if you'd like, just leave a reply here on or on my talk page.
As said above, I have no reason to oppose, but on the other hand, I have scarce evidence to be fully comfortable with giving you the extra tools. Good luck on your future endauvers and with this RfA. --Addihockey10 e-mail 03:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The tool listed above was called VandelProof which is no longer being activly maintained I am now useing huggle which is listed in x's toolset (Ke5crz (talk) 03:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Also i would love that info if you don't mind(Ke5crz (talk) 03:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Pretty clear WP:NOTNOW, also move for a speedy close. Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ke5crz&oldid=1088101898"