Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 18[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 18, 2023.

Amtryptamine[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 29#Amtryptamine

Pax Russica[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#Pax Russica

Chicken Poutine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Poutine#Variations. Refined current target. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful and misleading – target gives no information about "chicken poutine". Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - while it's probably harmless, it's also going to be disappointing for a reader expecting to find information about "chicken poutine", which is just poutine with chicken on it, not a noteworthy variation. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine to Poutine#Variations. There's not that much content there, but chicken is certainly mentioned, and if chicken poutine is not a noteworthy variation, then WP:R#D10 does not apply. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 04:39, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trymene[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 06:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an alternative name for the target, not mentioned anywhere on enwiki. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

TI-001[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#TI-001

WikiProject Celts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not likely to be of use to general readers of Wikipedia. #prodraxis connect 21:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Danusia Samal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is unhelpful for anyone looking up information about Samal, as her name is included only once as part of the cast list. Samal has since starred in the The Great and worked as a writer for Gangs of London and the upcoming Bodies. It's possible she'll have her own article in the future, but this isn't a particularly helpful placeholder in the meantime. Sock (tock talk) 15:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I’m not nearly as familiar with notability guidelines as I’d like to be, but if there’s no particularly great target for a redirect, & Danusia Samal passes WP:NACTOR, it’s possible the redirect could be converted to a stub article to avoid deletion. If you look at the last three months, the redirect has been getting pageviews, which shows that it is being used. (Obviously, though, pageviews on their own don’t solve the problem of finding an appropriate target.) Best, user:A smart kittenmeow 20:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per reason 10: "the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject." Tevildo (talk) 06:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RFD#D10/WP:REDYES or create an article over the redirect if possible. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 06:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Redirects related to the upcoming James Bond film produced by Eon Productions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 18:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete these redirects. The target section for these redirects no longer exists in their target article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.209.40.250 (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Less bureaucracy, please. I see no reason to delete, and no better redirect candidate. Just leave it alone until the next film is announced. cagliost (talk) 15:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine to Production of the James Bond films#Future. I have restored a version of the section these used to target before an unsourced addition led to its complete removal. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This has been restored. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:8842:12C2:18AE:5321 (talk) 00:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete: I think that looking for a new actor to play James Bond is a relatively strong sign there will be a 26th Bond movie, but it's not even in pre-production yet it seems, so I think the redirects are just slightly leaning too WP:CRYSTAL for me. Support recreation upon any further confirmation of a 26th Bond film. TartarTorte 01:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (though I have reinstated the deletion tags after premature removal) - I think it's likely that a user may search for these looking to see what the status of any forthcoming film was likely to be. In my opinion this does not contravene CRYSTAL, as there is a sourced reference in the target section. — Voice of Clam (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep is mentioned in the target article and is a plausible search term. The fact the film hasn't entered pre-production doesn't mean it's inappropriate for Wikipedia, and even if the Bond film series were to be cancelled there would undoubtedly be quite a bit of coverage of that in one of the relevant articles. It is common practice to include information about potential future franchise films in the article about the franchise. Hut 8.5 18:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep, as the section now exists again and will presumably become more developed over time as more information is published about the subject. Even if the film doesn’t make it to production, I can plausibly see a section in an article that describes how the 26th Bond film wasn’t created - which I feel would also be a plausible target for this redirect (for people wanting to find out what happened to the presumed upcoming film). Best, user:A smart kittenmeow 11:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Knallhatten[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish translation of work; not present in article. ArcticSeeress (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LGBT activists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of LGBT rights activists. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 18:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m nominating this redirect separately than those under § LGBT activist as it’s the only one I could find that used the plural activists instead of the singular activist. I’m taking it to RfD along with the activist-singular redirects (1) for consistency, and (2) as I believe, as it uses the plural form, List of LGBT rights activists could be a better target potentially. user:A smart kittenmeow 10:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said below, I agree that List of LGBT rights activists is the most appropriate target. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 11:04, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Common target with the others, breaking one off for singular vs plural seems like it just creates potential confusion. Darker Dreams (talk) 12:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with QuietHere - List of LGBT rights activists should be the target for all of these. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto. – GnocchiFan (talk) 15:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LGBT activist[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget all to List of LGBT rights activists and keep those that already target there. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 18:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These all seem (to me at least) like they should point to a common target. I’m therefore opening this RfD discussion to determine the best common target for these redirects. All the best, user:A smart kittenmeow 10:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of LGBTQ rights activist, it is my opinion that List of LGBT rights activists is the most appropriate target for all of them because "activist" clearly denotes a person and so I would expect the term to lead me to a page specifically about people.
Also, per the {{RfD}} template's presence on it, it appears that LGBT activists is also part of this discussion and should be added to the list. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 11:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote that last part before noticing the separate discussion above. Personally, I don't see the point in separating them; if it were the difference between "activist" and "activism" then it would make more sense, but in this case I think they're essentially performing the same task. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 11:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree that List of LGBT rights activists is the best redirect. – GnocchiFan (talk) 15:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Война Слава[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target and no mention on Russian-language Wikipedia. Search engines do not talk about the topic of the article when you search "Война Слава". ArcticSeeress (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I don't really see the relevence here for this phrase to this target, and per research I came up with similar results as nom. Unsure if there's something I'm missing, but I can find no inherent connection. TartarTorte 17:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – It's not even correct grammatically, as both words are in the nominative case without a comma to separate subjects. Even adjusting to "Война славы" (war of glory) as likely intended, there's nothing in the search results that has its own Wikipedia article. Randi🦋TalkContribs 10:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: no good reason to have this redirect. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 06:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikilove[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia community. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Main to projectspace XNR - not likely to be used by general readers. #prodraxis connect 04:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Wrong[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#Wikipedia:Wrong

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_18&oldid=1177700731"