Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 18[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 18, 2023.

Eclipse of God[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 27#Eclipse of God

Radical theology[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 26#Radical theology

Nietzsche is dead[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 26#Nietzsche is dead

Zarathustra (fictional philosopher)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 26#Zarathustra (fictional philosopher)

TSZ[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by creator. (non-admin closure) Carpimaps (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a common abbreviation. Also, Tsz seems to be used in many Chinese topics (e.g., Tsz Shan Monastery, Tsz Wan Shan, Tin Tsz). Therefore, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 21:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete lots of partial title matches in en.wiki. I suggest letting search do its thing instead --Lenticel (talk) 12:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not mentioned, and inhibiting Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: the creator has deleted it (see [1]). Veverve (talk) 10:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sam Tai Tsz[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 26#Sam Tai Tsz

Saracen Empire[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Saracen. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if the current target is really good.

Here is what Saracen says. On the one hand, it is used to refer to Arabs, whatever their religion may be. On another hand: " The Roman Catholic Church and European Christian leaders used the term during the Middle Ages to refer to Muslims—usually Arabs, Turks, and Iranians"; so not exclusive to Arabs, but exclusive to all Muslims.

So, I do not know what to propose. Maybe those could be retargetted to Saracen, or simply be deleted. Veverve (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, redirect them to the article discussing the same peculiar term. The list at "Arab empire" also has no captions, so it's extra bad. --Joy (talk) 08:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zoroastrianism:[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by The Anome. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The ":" at the end makes this redirect unhelpful. I recommend deletion. Veverve (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Guebres[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gabr. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target. I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Veverve (talk) 21:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Retarget to Gabr. Geubre seems to be a synoynm but I'm not sure if geubres is a valid plural form for the word. --Lenticel (talk) 12:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changed to Retarget per Uanfala's findings --Lenticel (talk) 04:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pendar[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 2#Pendar

Magianism[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 25#Magianism

Gheber[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gabr. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target. I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Veverve (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Veverve, looking at a redirect's history can often give you clues about what it's supposed to mean. This one was created in 2006 with the edit summary mk redirect according to Webster's 1913 ed. and Richard Burton. English dictionaries [2] [3] define "gheber" as denoting (modern day) followers of the religion, but I'm not sure this term is neutral, so it seems best to retarget to Gabr, of which this is clearly a variant. – Uanfala (talk) 13:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agreee with User:Uanfala's suggestion to retarget to Gabr. It's a more direct and relevant target. --Slashme (talk) 09:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Majosism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Majus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target. I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Veverve (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was created as an article in 2012, and managed to exist for a day. Its content was '''Majosism''' or '''Majosi''' (Arabic: مجوسی /مجوسیت )is Arabic name for [[Zoroastrianism]].And this name is given by Holy [[Quran]].<ref>Quran:Surah</ref>. The redirect should probably be retargeted to Majus, the article about the term. – Uanfala (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Majus per Uanfala. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lauren Bernat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. If someone really wants to restore and take it to AfD, we can do that, but it seems unlikely to lead to a different result (per Uanfala). Legoktm (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, because the relevant paragraph was removed in 2015. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Bernat. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 05:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Can be recreated if the relevant part is re-added and is appropriate. A7V2 (talk) 05:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Potentially the article in the history of Wii Fit Girl could be restored and then Lauren Bernat redirected to it, but I don't think that would be necessary, depending on whether or not WP:G4 applies. But I don't object to restoring, anyway. A7V2 (talk) 05:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not WP:G4 applies, I doubt the article is worth restoring. The concerns at AfD were per WP:BLP1E, which still seems to apply even if the article has been completely rewritten. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 22:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 21:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The nomination statement makes sense, and given the BLP1E arguments present I doubt it would need to be restored. The WordsmithTalk to me 02:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore Wii Fit Girl and let the Afd decide. If there is content that can be merged, it should be done. The deletion review that happened was for Lauren Bernat, but using the then freshly created Wii Fit Girl as an argument. The (incorrect) DRV was actually an argument to keep the vastly expanded Wii Fit Girl, rather than reversing the deletion of Lauren Bernat. Jay 💬 07:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Technically, the AFD/DRV results don't apply here: a BLP1E biography may be non-notable, but the event itself can have notability. However, in the linked discussions, I don't see anyone other than the page creator arguing for that. Given the time frame (the article existed for less than a day 13 years ago) and the nature of the topic (an apparently now long-forgotten viral video), I doubt anyone would argue now that the article should exist. – Uanfala (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Aryaee[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 25#Aryaee

Ahriman and Ormuzd[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 25#Ahriman and Ormuzd

KUTK[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 17:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Acronym doesn't appear on page Rusalkii (talk) 04:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment – This acronym is from a transliteration of the Russian name for the university. КУТК is used in Russian, but it seems unlikely for KUTK to be used in English. Randi Moth (talk) 07:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – I see some sources that seem to use it.[4][5][6] Should probably be added to the article. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 22:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It's a niche academic term but for that scope is used quite commonly in the academic literature, and redirects are WP:CHEAP. -- Rauisuchian (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, mention was added by Rauisuchian. Jay 💬 12:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pingshan railway station (Sichuan)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 25#Pingshan railway station (Sichuan)

Yogi Adityanath ministry (2017–[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both are a result of a typo (unclosed parenthesis), have no incoming links and have more proper redirects Yogi Adityanath ministry (2017-) and Yogi Adityanath ministry (2017–). Gonnym (talk) 10:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Orange Man Bad[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Donald Trump in popular culture#Orange man bad. It's snowing! (non-admin closure) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 16:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This phrase isn't used to describe Trump himself. The current target is not helpful, and it's unclear whether a better one exists on WP. An anonymous username, not my real name 06:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It's a phrase used by his supporters when criticism is leveraged against him, particularly on-line, especially on Reddit. It probably shouldn't be in the Donald Trump article, but rather any of the various Trump criticism articles -- Criticism of Donald Trump 24.51.192.49 (talk) 13:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jan Huygen van Linschoten, Market of Goa, Itinerario[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 25#Jan Huygen van Linschoten, Market of Goa, Itinerario

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_18&oldid=1142903127"