Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 28[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 28, 2022.

Iranian people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Iranians. Legoktm (talk) 01:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Iranians. Privybst (talk) 21:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Could an admin please add the RfD template to this as it is currently fully protected? A7V2 (talk) 06:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Iranians. I don't think the current target is the primary topic for this. A7V2 (talk) 06:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Thryduulf (talk) 23:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Iranians anyway. The ancient peoples may have the greatest long-term significance but I'd bet that today's general public may be more familiar with people connected to modern-day Iran (see also Charles III being declared primary topic despite his relative historical insignificance, because of his present-day relevancy). I conclude that there is no primary topic. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Palauan people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close. Nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Thryduulf (talk) 23:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palauans and Palauan people should redirect to the same article. Micronesians#Palauans or Demographics of Palau? Privybst (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Glennznl I convinced that Micronesians#Palauans would be better target as you said that people typing this title into the search bar are looking for the ethnic group, not demographics. But let us hear another opinion. Privybst (talk) 10:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Boo Buddy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 10:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Variant of the boo. Not found in article and doesn’t have any sources to warrant a mention. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 19:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hammer and Chisel[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 6#Hammer and Chisel

Queen's speech[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Queen's speech

Dark boo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 10:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A minor enemy from the Paper Mario series. Not mentioned in article and doesn’t have any sources to warrant it a mention. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 19:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kyrgyzstani (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Kyrgyzstani redirects to Demographics of Kyrgyzstan per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Uzbekistani. Privybst (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I don't understand the rationale here? As it currently stands, the primary topic for the term "Kyrgyzstani" is Demographics of Kyrgyzstan. Of course the term could refer to anything pertaining to Kyrgyzstan, hence the hatnote at the Demographics article, and what it says at the top of Kyrgyz. Given what is on this disambiguation page it seems a completely sensible redirect. A7V2 (talk) 07:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Can 'Kyrgyz' refer to something of, from Kyrgyzstan, to things related to Kyrgyzstan? Privybst (talk) 09:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, e.g. "The Kyrgyz economy is projected to shrink by 5%..." World Bank, "Then, in November 2019 the Kyrgyz team made a successful debut in Olympic Qualification..." IIHF. Thryduulf (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, now I see. I withdraw the nomination. Privybst (talk) 09:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per A7V2. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 08:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per A7V2. Thryduulf (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Uzbekistani (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 09:49, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Uzbekistani redirects to Demographics of Uzbekistan per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Uzbekistani. Privybst (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - As with the above nomination I don't understand the justification to delete? The close of the linked discussion specifically mentions disambiguating with a hatnote. A consensus that something is the primary topic definitely doesn't mean that something is not ambiguous. This is an obvious search term for the disambiguation page containing things pertaining to Uzbekistan. A7V2 (talk) 07:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per A7V2. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 08:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can 'Uzbek' refer to something of, from Uzbekistan, to things related to Uzbekistan? Privybst (talk) 09:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per A7V2. Thryduulf (talk) 09:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I withdraw the nomination. Privybst (talk) 09:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kazakhstani (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 09:49, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I retargeted Kazakhstani to Demographics of Kazakhstan and added hatnote in Demographics of Kazakhstan. Per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Uzbekistani. Privybst (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You know what they say, the more the merrier![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A quote from Dr. Eggman himself. It is not referenced in the article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chuckles The Echidna[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely typo. Most likely also a joke since he “doesn’t chuckle”. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mecha Knuckles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A boss from Sonic Advance. Not mentioned in either article. Possibly WP:Gamecruft? Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unknown from M.E[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The title is Knuckles’s theme song from Sonic Adventure. Nowhere to be found on Wikipedia and we don’t have a article on the music of Sonic Adventure. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bridgit (software)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5 - the creator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Thryduulf (talk) 10:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Software tool not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:15, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This is a very odd page. Looking at the page log, this page was an article that was WP:G5'd then the next day it was recreated as a redirect by a different user with the message "redirect the deleted page about the construction software". TartarTorte 17:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I've requested an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bennet43 (the deletion log entry links to that master). Thryduulf (talk) 18:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete there used to be an article about some software called Bridgit which helps people manage construction projects, that was deleted under G5. However the redirect doesn't make any sense, the software isn't mentioned at the target, and someone else might potentially want to write an article about the software if it's notable. (The sock did find quite a few references about it.) Hut 8.5 18:34, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Redirect doesn't make any sense, and someone may make a article later on. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 09:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - clearly not a helpful redirect. Construction is an incredibly broad concept and does not address Bridgit in any sense. I don't see evidence that this software is notable, but if it is, redirect is also holding up article creation. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 14:19, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eastern civilization[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Eastern culture (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Eastern world. Privybst (talk) 13:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. As with "western cizilization" (see comments below) Furius (talk) 14:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Western civilization[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Western culture (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Western world. Privybst (talk) 13:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I think "Western civilization" usually refers to culture, rather than to the political bloc (which is largely the focus of Western world). Western culture even opens "Western culture, also known as Western civilization, Occidental culture, or Western society..." [Edit: User:Carchasm's proposal is better, let's do that.] Furius (talk) 14:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Western culture (disambiguation) - we already have a page to distinguish between the concepts and western civilization could be either world or culture. - car chasm (talk) 14:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gold Dry Bowser[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A minor character from Mario Kart Tour. Not mentioned in article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kerog[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be tagged as R From an incorrect name. But has had 0 page views in the last 30 days. Apparently a book called Bowser by this name. I really doubt any one will type this into the search bar if they are looking for Bowser. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bowser Sr.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Thryduulf (talk) 11:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These terms is not used in any Wikipedia article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: While not mentioned in the article, his canonical son is Bowser Jr. (which is mentioned in the article) making this a plausible search term. We can tag with {{R from incorrect name}} if desired. TartarTorte 13:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As gamecruft. I don't believe it's plausible as Nintendo never refers to him as "Senior". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Clearly plausible {{R from incorrect name}} due to the target subject's in-universe som being named "Bowser Jr." Steel1943 (talk) 01:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as {{R from search term}} since the son is "Bowser Jr." this is a reasonable search term -- 65.92.247.226 (talk) 04:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sovereign state that's a member of the UN in its own right[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of sovereign states. (non-admin closure) Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody will use this sentense for a search. Privybst (talk) 13:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: This is a pretty bizarrely specific search term. I can't imagine much damage will be done with deletion here. TartarTorte 13:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Struck vote, despite watching lots of Only Connect, I've somehow not watched Pointless and probably should start watching it (or at the very least, reading the article history on redirects that have weird names because the names are often explained there. trout Self-trout). TartarTorte 13:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to List of sovereign states. As noted in the history, this is the criteria used on Pointless to define what they mean by "country" so it's not at all an implausible search term. It's not mentioned on the article about the show, so that wouldn't make a good search therm, but List of sovereign states does note UN membership so contains the information someone using this search term is looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to List of sovereign states per Thryduulf. A7V2 (talk) 07:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A fairly unnatural search term that makes for an implausible redirect. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Why is a phrase that is repeatedly used in a very popular long-running mainstream TV programme "unnatural"? Thryduulf (talk) 10:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to List of sovereign states per Thryduulf identifying it's used as a common-phrase on Pointless. TartarTorte 13:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Thryduulf (talk) 23:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete makes no sense. 96.18.106.49 (talk) 01:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oversaturated[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Saturation. (non-admin closure) Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Usage on Wikipedia is mostly for excessive market saturation, or other uses. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shrowser[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this character anywhere on Wikipedia. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The term refers to a form Bowser assumes at the end of Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time. Either retarget to that game with a mention or delete if the mention is undue weight. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per "No mention of this character anywhere on Wikipedia." No mention is no mention, meaning readers searching this term will find no information anywhere, regardless what other subject on Wikipedia the subject of this redirect may have a strong connection to (Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time). Steel1943 (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The king of second bananas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently a meme but it is not mentioned in the article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as implausible to be search or present in the target article. Sergecross73 msg me 12:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the wiki isn't a indiscriminate collection of memes --Lenticel (talk) 05:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I thought this referred to Diddy Kong. Steel1943 (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Engla[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 6#Engla

SBS0[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note related nominations with identical rationales combined. Thryduulf (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep. SBS used to broadcast on Channel 0 in the 80s. Bassie f (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep as a plausible search term due to SBS being formerly channel 0. @Nick Mitchell 98: most if not all of the nominations you have made are missing the RfD template. A7V2 (talk) 07:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I've added the RfD template to all of Nick Mitchell 98's nominations. I'm just about to see if people who should be notified have been and notify them if they haven't. Thryduulf (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a former name for the target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Network 0-28[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note related nominations with identical rationales combined. Thryduulf (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and tag as {{R from former name}} as these are names the target was previously known by according to the article and I can't find any evidence that other subjects do or have ever used the name. Thryduulf (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. A7V2 (talk) 07:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a former name for the target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Channel 11 Australia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). Also not a legitimate former name for the article topic. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

BBC 3 (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note related nominations with identical rationales combined. Thryduulf (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as harmless and unambiguous - there is no other page that anybody using this could be looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 14:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. I can't fathom how reasons to delete 1 or 2 apply here. A7V2 (talk) 07:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. Harmless. MB 14:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eleven (Australian television channel)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). Unnecessary alternate form of article's former name Eleven (Australian TV channel) which breaks the MOS format for TV channel article names. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep a very plausible search term for the former name of the target. We don't require readers to know our precise article titling conventions in order to find the content they are looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 12:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. Article indicates this is an Australian channel fka Eleven. Makes sense to keep. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 16:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a former name of the target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 02:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as former name for this channel. I can't fathom how reasons to delete 1 or 2 apply here. "Unnecessary" is not a reason to delete, seems very plausible as a search term to me. A7V2 (talk) 07:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

X TEN Australia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). Also not a legitimate former name for the article topic. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as an unambiguous search term for the subject, an Australian TV channel that formerly used X TEN branding. Thryduulf (talk) 12:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. I can't fathom how reasons to delete 1 or 2 apply here. A7V2 (talk) 07:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a former name for the target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Channel Ten Australia[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Channel Ten Australia

Independent Television System[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Snowy Mountains TV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep completely unambiguous very plausible search term for the target. I'd not object to a speedy keep for this one. Thryduulf (talk) 12:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep "TV" is a plausible abbreviation for "television." - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 02:18, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. I can't fathom how reasons to delete 1 or 2 could apply to these. A7V2 (talk) 07:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1 HD (Australia)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note related nominations with identical rationales combined. Thryduulf (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep these are unambiguous search terms for the former name of the target (One HD). Thryduulf (talk) 12:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. I can't fathom how reasons to delete 1 or 2 could apply to these. A7V2 (talk) 07:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a former name for the target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Channel 31 Sydney[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sydney's TVS[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Sydney's TVS

Digital 44 Sydney[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as unambiguous, plausible (it is based in Sydney) and harmless. Thryduulf (talk) 12:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. A7V2 (talk) 07:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Channel 4 (AU)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LINC TV Lismore[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). Also unnecessary disambig. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as unambiguous and harmless {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} redirects (disambiguation being unnecessary is not a reason to delete). Thryduulf (talk) 12:43, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. Unnecessary disambiguation is very rarely going to be a reason to delete a redirect. I can't fathom how reasons to delete 1 or 2 could apply to these. A7V2 (talk) 07:37, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ACE TV (Adelaide)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Channel 31 Adelaide[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a highly plausible search term for the target's former name (Channel 31) which is noted in the article. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. I can't fathom how reasons to delete 1 or 2 could apply to this. A7V2 (talk) 07:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CTS (TV station)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to CTS#Television. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). Also not a legitimate name for the article topic. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Network 7 Australia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note related nominations with identical rationales combined. Thryduulf (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep these are all highly plausible search terms for the target. The Network seven disambiguation page shows that it is highly likely people will not expect the article to be at the base name and so add "Australia" to ensure they arrive at the content they are looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. Improper application of RFD deletion rationale. --‡ El cid, el campeador talk 16:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. I can't fathom how reasons to delete 1 or 2 could apply to this. A7V2 (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prime Television (Australia)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). Also unnecessary disambig when Prime Television exists. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a very plausible and unambiguous search term. Unnecessary disambiguation is not a reason to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 12:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: With the existence Amazon Prime TV especially, this seems like a reasonable disambiguator. TartarTorte 13:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. Unnecessary disambiguation is not a reason to delete a redirect anyway. A7V2 (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per TartarTorte. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prime TV Australia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Unambiguous and highly plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 12:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. A7V2 (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Warren Pineda[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer mentioned the target for over 10 years. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:B8D6:4AA9:CD91:CD00 (talk) 04:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Moonu nombu[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Draft:Moonu nombu

Flying Pig Enterprises[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. Not sure what the connection may be, if any. Searching finds a shell website for FPE but that doesn't give any information. Delete. MB 03:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete there is/was a comics publisher called Flying Pig Enterprises, [1] says that Gary Spencer Millidge drew the cover for one of their comics, so possibly he worked there or had some ownership in the company. However it isn't mentioned in the article so it isn't a reasonable redirect. Hut 8.5 18:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Private Meeting[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Private Meeting

Initialisation and Support Application[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target, vague term that could apply to many products. Delete. MB 03:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Does seem somehow related to an ICL product (eg see [2] and Isa#Computing) but without a mention this is not helpful and may satisfy WP:RFD#D10. Not mentioned at International Computers Limited either. Could be kept if mention is added and justified at either of those targets or perhaps somewhere else (other than the disambiguation page). A7V2 (talk) 08:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gender violence[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gender-related violence. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:27, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Gender violence also includes Violence against men and Violence against LGBT people. Current redirections violate WP:NPOV. Sharouser (talk) Sharouser (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've added {{old rfd list}} noting the prior discussion, but Sharouser you should really have done that yourself as the editor listing this discussion, or at least indicated the content of the past discussion in your opening statement. signed, Rosguill talk 01:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unchanged. As I said the last time OP made this nomination over a year ago, this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and should be kept to avoid WP:FALSEBALANCE. The idea that violence against LGBT people is gender-based violence, per se, rather than its own type, appears to be WP:Original research. Indeed, the vast majority of LGBT people are men or women; implying that is a separate gender seems rather sketchy. Most important, though, is what the most reliable sources say, and here is what Google Scholar turns up: 1. Extent and nature of the problem - Gender-based violence includes a host of harmful behaviors that are directed at women and girls because of their sex, including... [3] In 1993, the United Nations General Assembly defined violence against women as “any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women” (United Nations, 1993). The United Nations referred to “gender-based” violence to acknowledge that such violence is rooted in gender inequality and is often tolerated and condoned by laws, institutions and community norms; it is not only a manifestation of gender-inequality, but often serves to enforce it (Heise, Ellsberg and Gottemoeller, 1999). Gender-based violence comes in many forms throughout the life cycle; this review focuses on the two most common types: physical intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women by any perpetrator. (2005 review) Primary prevention programs address the underlying attitudes, norms, and behaviors that support GBV. The ultimate goals are to end violence, empower women and girls, and promote nonviolent, equitable, and respectful relationships. [4] This 2020 paper uses the term and is about violence against women. Again and again Google Scholar shows that the term is specifically about violence against women and girls. One quote above shows why - it's rooted in systemic gender inequality. The sources are clear and we must follow them. Crossroads -talk- 02:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    None of those quotes actually do show that, they all say that gender-based violence includes violence against women and/or that violence against women is an example of gender-based violence. Thryduulf (talk) 03:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambig (second choice add a hatnote to a disambig), because while violence against women is one of the most prevalent expressions of gender-based violence, women are far from the only victims and increasingly many organisations and journal articles do not confine the term to just women. For example:
    • "Long before Covid-19, women, girls, trans and non-binary people were already facing an equally devastating but largely ignored pandemic." -Oxfam
    • "Gender based violence (GBV) is [...] committed primarily but not exclusively against women by men." -Public Health Scotland
    • "GBV is violence directed against a person because of that person's gender or violence that affects persons of a particular gender disproportionately. [...] It can include violence against women, domestic violence against women, men or children living in the same domestic unit." European Union
    • "Gender-based violence is violence directed against a person because of their gender. Both women and men experience gender-based violence but the majority of victims are women and girls." European Institute for Gender Equality
    • "Gender-based violence (GBV) is an umbrella term for any harm that is perpetrated against a person’s will and that results from power inequalities based on gender roles." Wirtz, A. 2018 'Gender-Based Violence Against Transgender People in the United States: A Call for Research and Programming'
    • "While initially focused primarily on men’s violence against women (VAW) [...] the definitions of GBV used by different governments and organisations have expanded to include violence against the LGBTQIA+ community, and sometimes violence against men. [...] many groups who also experience GBV, often at higher rates than the cis-gendered women who are traditionally seen as its victims or survivors." Graaf, K. 2021 'The Implications of a Narrow Understanding of Gender-Based Violence'.
    Nobody is arguing that women are not the only victims of GBV, just that GBV does not exclusively refer to violence against women by men, indeed one journal article focused in part on gender-based violence among men who have sex with men (not quoted above as the definition is not included in the freely-available part). Thryduulf (talk) 03:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Thryduulf: this is not an appropriate title for disambiguation, as the proposed topics are not unrelated. Now, if there was a notable album titled Gender Violence, or a TV episode or the like, then we would have actual title ambiguity. What you are looking for here is a WP:BROADCONCEPT article on the general subject of violence motivated by gender. BD2412 T 05:47, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Whatever it is technically, there should be a page that performs the function of linking to all our articles about specific types of gender-based violence. I don't mind if that's a disambig, a set-index, broad concept article, a list or something else. Please take my "disambig" !vote as a reference to any of those. Thryduulf (talk) 09:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unchanged. Examining sources in the violence against women article and more generally, "gender-based violence" is used as a synonym for "violence against women" in particular. The violence is disproportionately directed against them. Originoa (talk) 06:28, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Gender-related violence, which Thryduulf created based on a draft we wrote together in the previous RfD, per his arguments above and his and my arguments last year. This redirect currently does not point where most readers would expect it to. If there's a desire for that DAB page to be a broad-concept article instead, it can be tagged with {{Broad-concept article}}, but the perfect is the enemy of the good. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 15:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd forgotten I created that, it is indeed the ideal target for these redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to gender-related violence -- 65.92.247.226 (talk) 04:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

English-language given names[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#English-language given names

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_28&oldid=1114539314"