Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 31, 2022.

The Sims 2 Characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to The Sims 2#Sims. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per below as this article does not talk about the characters in Sims 2. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 22:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clyde!Franklin! 23:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kriyayoga[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 16#Kriyayoga

PlayStation 5 Pro[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#PlayStation 5 Pro

Bob Newbie[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A character from the from the franchise. Not mentioned in the article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per retargeting suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clyde!Franklin! 20:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom's nomination statement. Also, as shown here, the spelling of this redirect represents a distinct subject readers may desire to locate. Unless there is evidence that sources spell Bob Newby as "Bob Newbie", readers attempting to find the The Sims characters will be in for a WP:SURPRISE and may even think the name "Bob Newby" is based off the The Sims character. Steel1943 (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless the character is referred to as a newbie nickname in the series. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The good breast[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#The good breast

Talamh an Éisc agus Labradar[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Talamh an Éisc agus Labradar

High-residue diet[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#High-residue diet

Xbox executable[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file format that the Xbox uses for its games. Not mentioned in the article and there doesn’t seem to be any reliable sources that mention this file format. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 16:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not mentioned at target, and no reliable sources to back this up. CycloneYoris talk! 22:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xenia (Emulator)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Xenia (Emulator)

X80x[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion this doesn’t seem to be a plausible stylization or alternative title as it is not mentioned in reliable sources/Google and it is not mentioned in the article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 16:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both no references to show the numerical stylization. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per nom and Angus. I couldn't find any evidence of this stylization either-the logo just shows an O and a B (albeit with a slightly extended middle line) rather than a 0 or 8. Regards, SONIC678 18:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xbox Wire[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Xbox#Xbox Wire. signed, Rosguill talk 21:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a news website dedicated to Xbox. It not mentioned in the article and no reliable sources mention it either. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 15:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's not a news website but Microsoft's own news channel for the platform (link). It should probably be added to the article and then this redirect changed to the corresponding section. Sources: [1][2][3]. IceWelder [✉] 16:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a parent company/publisher it could be redirected to? That's a common solution to this sort of issue. Sergecross73 msg me 22:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The publisher is Microsoft's Xbox division, which the redirect currently points to. IceWelder [✉] 13:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Changing !vote to Retarget to Xbox#Xbox Wire. New section created from the sources provided above. IceWelder [✉] 13:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha. Sorry, I was thinking it was related to "Nintendo Wire", which is just a run of the mill fansite. I support your retargeting. Sergecross73 msg me 17:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’ll Retarget also. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Next Generation Xbox[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A costly redirect. We would have to maintain this redirect and Retarget to a different article every specific year. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 15:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The creator of this redirect is now deceased. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:00, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user has been blocked. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 21:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user has now been unblocked. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. It makes no sense to redirect it to the main Xbox article anyways. Also, Magnatyrannus the creator has been dead since January (July? I forgot even though I just checked) so they aren't "now deceased" as in they just died. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Twist Control[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This could be a generic term. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xbox 365[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When this was created, it had the edit summary “common mistake” however I doubt this is a common mistake due to the “5” in the redirect as it is about 4 keys away from the “0” key. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

365 and 360 are both very commonly known numbers that are numerically close to each other. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Willing to reconsider if given evidence, but I don't believe that to be a common mistake/search term. Sergecross73 msg me 21:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ⓒ (technical rename)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G6. Legoktm (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "(technical rename)" in the title comes from the Unicode 11 case map migration. I think that the redirect should now be deleted, since ⓒ is now treated the same as Ⓒ. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NeXtBox[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn’t seem to be an actual alternative name for the target. I also feel like this is implausible due to the random capitalized “X” in the redirect. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Project Xenon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdraw. It is mentioned in the article. (non-admin closure) Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn’t seem to actually be an alternative name to the target article as Google says nothing related to the Xbox and it is not mentioned in the article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SimPrograms[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Since the AfD for the proposed retarget destination closed as delete, the consensus is to delete these redirects. As for Simprograms, there was some interest in retargeting it to simulations, but I would say there was no consensus in favor of it, hence deletion. If someone wants to recreate it as a redirect, I don't think this discussion should stop them. Legoktm (talk) 23:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a website. Not mentioned in the article and no reliable sources to warrant a mention. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore the above listed BeyondSims and retarget these there. This is the former name of that website. Might be easier to merge these discussions. A7V2 (talk) 06:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    At the time when I nominated these I thought they were different websites. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget "simprograms" to simulation, since there are many sim software and programs that use simulations -- 65.92.244.114 (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - BeyondSims has been restored and is now at AfD, and has "SimPrograms" bolded as a former name. I again suggest we should retarget there unless it is deleted before this is closed, in which case I would change my !vote to delete all except perhaps the lowercase one which could be retargeted per the IP. A7V2 (talk) 22:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget all to BeyondSims where they previously targeted prior to the BLAR, if Afd closes before this discussion, treat these redirect as if they were redirects to that page (i.e. delete or retarget as appropriate). I don't think Simprograms is a good redirect for simulation, given the potential for confusion with The Sims related things and that Sim program or Sim programs and the like (Simprogram or Simulation program) are not existing redirects, making the version without the space a bit implausible as a search term. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: @Mdewman6: @A7V2: BeyondSims was deleted at AfD and is now a redlink. CycloneYoris talk! 23:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xbox Loop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another theorized title for this console. It is not mentioned in the article and it only has 193 page views throughout its entire lifetime. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xbox Infinity[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another theorized title for the console though it is not mentioned in the article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xbox Fusion[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to google, people theorized that the Xbox 1 would be called this. Despite this it is not mentioned in the article and has only had 126 page views throughout its lifetime. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xbox Azure[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Azure is not on the Xbox Series X. This is not mentioned in the article and no reliable sources mention it. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Invincibubble[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#The Invincibubble

Mr. Superawesomeness[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Mr. Superawesomeness

Sour Note[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Sour Note

Sir Pinch-a-Lot[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Sir Pinch-a-Lot

The Rodent (Spongebob)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗plicit 14:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is Sandy Cheeks superhero alter ego in the movie though it is not mentioned inside the article nor is it in reliable sources. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

More Plastic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not particularly known as Monstercat artists; this duo also has a long history of NoCopyrightSounds releases. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Nominator has not provided a source for NCS work. Jalen Folf (talk) 09:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - More Plastic is not currently listed in NoCopyrightSounds#Artists. A7V2 (talk) 06:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I am unable to find a reliable source describing their connection to NCS. Inclusion in the list at NCS would violate WP:LISTPEOPLE as there is no third-party source for such a connection. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This musical artist appears to be right on the line between being somewhat notable and not notable at all, I guess. Difficult call. Deletion seems best, though, since the group can't be reliably described in any detail using sources. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article does exist, but I feel uncertain about using it as a citation for anything at all. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is why the redirect exists for the moment. The current target has the musical group as a list entry with a reliable source for the connection. I am unable to find a third-party source connecting them to NCS. Besides, this isn't AfD. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Meh. While I don't think it's helpful to redirect a term to a "skeleton list", search results are not helpful here. All other relevant mentions are minor anyway: Pegboard Nerds discography and StepManiaX. -- Tavix (talk) 23:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: User:Mellohi! to respond to provide a source for NCS work.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Response Primary sources, but NCS hosts More Plastic songs on their official Soundcloud and their official YouTube channel. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The first, and most fundamental, requirement for a redirect is for its target to have non-trivial relevant content, or at least be expected to have such content in the future. Neither of these are met: there's only the barest possible mention of the topic (from which it's only clear that "More Plastic" is the name of a person, or band, that is, or was, signed to the Monstercat label), and there's no prospect for that mention to be meaningfully expanded (the article has similar mentions of around 240 other topics and it's pretty big already). – Uanfala (talk) 19:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Uanfala. I agree that a bare mention shouldn't be enough for a redirect. A7V2 (talk) 06:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Uanfala. At this point, it may be worth reviewing all incoming redirects to List of Monstercat artists to see which ones have similar issues. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rameses B[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The sole keep comment was addressed by the nominator, that there was another label the artist had contributed to. Legoktm (talk) 23:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not particularly known as a Monstercat artist. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, I don't think it's a good idea to redirect terms to a list that contains no further information about the term, especially when search results give more information. In this case, search results reveal that Ramesses B released a single with Aruna (singer), was featured in StepManiaX, and contributed music for Rocket League. -- Tavix (talk) 22:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

John Carr (government adviser)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While the article provides a brief quote from Carr, it provides no information about Carr himself (and such information would not be within the scope of the article). Graham (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: The redirect does not take us to information about Carr. It's also got a chance of causing offence or complaint if Carr is still around. Furius (talk) 01:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spongebob 2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same problems with SpongeBob 3. Could also refer to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 2). Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral (between keep or delete; I oppose any kind of disambiguation) - it's not clear from a search if this film is widely referred to as "SpongeBob 2" and similar, but I find it very hard to beleive that someone searching for this is looking for season 2. Of course if you search "spongebob 2" in google you get hits for season 2, but that is more a partial title match than an alternate name. A7V2 (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Looking at Google I get a ton of different results. From the movie to the season to a video game and also a toaster. 2601:441:8201:F570:BD12:41E5:6DEF:1B85 (talk) 02:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no clear media that is called Spongebob 2 AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The SpongeBob Movie: It's a Wonderful Sponge (version 2)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I completed the history merge beforehand. ✗plicit 02:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inplausible redirects due to the “(version 2)” in the title. This used to be an article before being BLARed due to both being too soon and uncited. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Llian[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Llian

Nadiril[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Nadiril

Isle of Noom[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#Isle of Noom

SpongeBob 3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could refer to any third SpongeBob thing like SpongeBob SquarePants (season 3). Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral between keeping and deleting, but leaning more towards deletion than in the above discussion for Spongebob 2 and similar. As with that discussion, I don't agree that this term is in any way ambiguous, and could only be referring to the film. A7V2 (talk) 02:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as no clear media that uses this title. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Planktopolis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A minor location in the movie. Not mentioned in the article. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_31&oldid=1122286923"