Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 25

May 25[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 25, 2022.

UKia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UKia → United Kingdom (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete as an implausible misspelling. Prompted by this discussion. Jr8825 • Talk 17:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I support deletion but I don't think its a misspelling. They were using -ia as a suffix to imply country. Its obviously just a joke redirect (i.e. vandalism) someone made. (almost 19 years ago!) Eopsid (talk) 11:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Classist Queen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Classist Queen → Yvie Oddly (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A quick search turns up no reason for me Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 03:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Floppase[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. The keep rationale presented in discussion renders the nomination moot. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Floppase → Flippase (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete, implausible misspelling. 72.10.126.198 (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a misspelling, keep reading the target. Flippases are described as transporters that move lipids from the exoplasmic to the cytosolic face, while floppases transport in the reverse direction with a citation to boot. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 03:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Epitipe[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Epitipe → Palindrome (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 08:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Epitope as a typo. BilledMammal (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is one of a handful of redirects to palindrome that are examples of palindromes, but are themselves meaningless. Could also, and perhaps more likely, be a typo of Epitype (redirect to Holotype). Delete to avoid confusion/astonishment. Mdewman6 (talk) 06:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as confusing and a misspelling of at least two wiki articles --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SLAY[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to SLAY Radio. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SLAY → Star Magic (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirect title is not mentioned whatsoever in the redirect target. Created by an individual blocked for undisclosed paid editing and might be an attempt to game SEO. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 16:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 19:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Slay is a disambiguation page, and the only item on it in all caps is SLAY Radio. Retarget to the radio station, or if other items in all caps are identified, retarget to the disambiguation page. - Eureka Lott 20:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or retarget to SLAY Radio per above. People might be ASTONISHed to land at a page where "SLAY" isn't even mentioned. Regards, SONIC678 15:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Slay Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 16:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to slay (disambiguation) ; aside from the radio station, a common way to style surnames is to ALLCAPS them -- 65.92.247.17 (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to SLAY Radio, with a hatnote to slay so that the dab is covered too. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to radio with hat to dab per others. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 03:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget - I agree with the above arguments. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Young Kindaichi’s Casebook[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Young Kindaichi’s Casebook → The Kindaichi Case Files (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Non-standard apostrophe, no incoming links. Already created Young Kindaichi's Casebook as replacement. PetéWarrior (talk) 04:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Harmless. Helps readers find what they're looking for, and it's nearly identical to the one with the standard apostrophe. No reason for deletion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

keep WP:CHEAP re CycloneYoris Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 03:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Low-calorie[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Calorie restriction. Nominally no consensus, defaulting to the front-runner option of retargeting in lieu of keeping due to lack of any support for the status quo. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low-calorie → Diet food (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Low calorie → Calorie restriction (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These two should redirect to the same article. I prefer calorie restriction as more specifically focusing on calories. eviolite (talk) 22:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. The phrase is not specific to either of their targets. Steel1943 (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dieting#Low-calorie looks to be the closest name match. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget both - I agree that these should go to 'calorie restriction' given the larger context of that article. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 21:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Demented Cartoon Movie[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Demented Cartoon Movie → Albino Blacksheep (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in target Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 10:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As odd as it is, "The Demented Cartoon Movie" actually appears to be the correct name of the movie, which was made by "Albino Blacksheep". The redirect makes sense, though the redirect target itself is in need of improvement. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 00:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See also the Uncyclopedia entry. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhawk10: The dispute isn't that it exists. Uncyclopedia is not a reliable source. I can't find any reliable sources that warrant mentiomning TDCM at Albino Blacksheep's page, which currently does not mention it at all. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not arguing that uncyclopedia is RS (by its very nature, it intentionally isn't). My point is that a redirect to the hosting website is fine. Perhaps it should warrant a mention on the target page. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not mentioned in target, and most likely shouldn't be. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Musical Genres/Hip Hop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Hip hop music. ✗plicit 10:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Musical Genres/Hip Hop → Rapping (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

If this oddly-formatted redirect is useful, it ought to target Hip hop music, but I'd lean delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This appears useless to me. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - noting that this redirect is from 2002, does it have any historical value? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Hip hop music as a {{R with old history}} (or rather {{R from subpage}}). -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 12:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Hip hop music. Old redirects from subpages are explicitly named by WP:RKEEP as redirects that should be kept (though I'd be open to revising that guidance). This one is unambiguous and so harmless. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 12:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)r[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

N.A.A.M. Brigade[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

N.A.A.M. Brigade → Music of Philadelphia (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Ram Squad → Music of Philadelphia (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. Just as a note, N.A.A.M. might have suggestions to redirect to Meek Mill but it seems that the member Meek Millz of N.A.A.M. is not the same person as Meek Mill and that Meek Mill stopped using Meek Millz after a feud with the Meek Millz in NAAM Brigade. In short, delete both. TartarTorte 20:42, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete N.A.A.M. Brigade / Keep Ram Squad. I do see why creating the Brigade redirect led to a consequence, but the Ram Squad are in no way related and they have a little notoriety. Why can't you just keep one for the sake of unrelation? Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 02:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that Ram Squad could be deleted under WP:REDYES. They likely do have notability, but they're just not covered at all at the Music of Philadelphia page. There's enough coverage about the unsolved killing of Tommy Butta alone for an article. TartarTorte 12:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional thoughts on Ram Squad?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both as not mentioned at the target and not useful. Note that I didn't get the redirect creator's point about keeping one for the sake of unrelation. Jay (talk) 03:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ꑭ[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 1#ꑭ

Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus trending towards keep, so I don't see any reason to relist for another round rather than closing now. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified → Amoy dialect#Negative particles (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

PRODded per WP:NOTDICT and then redirected, but it is not a plausible search term. The former contents already existed in the target at the time of creation, so attribution is not a problem. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 10:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 12:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#Reasons for not deleting ("They have a potentially useful page history" and "Someone finds them useful"). The page contains simplified Chinese characters that were not present in the target at the time of creation in 2007. Chinese characters were added about four years later in 2011 by another editor to Amoy dialect#Negative particles with modifications from what was in Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified. I consider this to be useful content and history that should be preserved. I removed the proposed deletion for Amoy dialect/Negative particles/traditional for the same reason. Cunard (talk) 18:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment These two were bought to light by my new page patrolling and I PROD'd them. I have no issue with them being redirects instead. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Cunard. To me the key word in "They have a potentially useful page history" is "potentially". The reason to delete of "unlikely search term" to me is the weakest reason to delete since no actual harm is caused by keeping. Since there is a reason to keep, that should overrule that this is an unlikely search term since, in the unlikely event of someone searching this, they will be taken to what they are looking for. The fact that this has existed at this title for so long is also a reason to keep as we risk breaking external links (again for no real benefit). A7V2 (talk) 03:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.