Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 7[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 7, 2022.

Z Street[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Street name#Lettered and numbered streets. Jay (talk) 08:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete as the original target is now a redirect to street name, which is a general discussion with nothing on this particular street name. Mangoe (talk) 16:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep (but fix double redirect). Currently this is a double redirect, but targets the section mentioned by A7V2 as a {{R to anchor}}. Redirecting here was the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Z_Street and I don't think the situation has changed appreciably since that consensus was formed. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Is Love Supposed to Hurt Like This?[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 17:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned on target now or at the time of creation. Cannot find a suitable target to redirect to. If there is a suitable target I'd have no objection to saving. Richhoncho (talk) 11:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was mentioned in the article. It is a literal translation of the Korean title of the song "사랑은 원래 이렇게 아픈 건가요", which was given the English title of "Love Fool". Some sources on the Internet (perhaps not too reliable, but they are out there) provide this as the translation of the Korean title. Ss112 12:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Kazhugu.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 17:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from helping differentiate from Kazhugu (2012 film), I think it should be deleted per G7. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:FILEREDIRECT, the title does not fall under one of the criteria for deletion, after 8 years at this title there are going to be a lot of historic uses. Ambiguity on its own is not justification to delete a redirect in file space. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 20:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:NFCC WP:GALLERY Wikipedia should not violate copyright laws by serving non-free content to off-site uses as an image server. -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 04:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the IP. NotReallySoroka (talk) 03:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:PEER[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Peer review. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:24, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Wikipedia:Peer review since PR is the primary topic. Mislinks to the WikiProject page can be seen at Talk:Main Page/Archive 61#Proposition for featured article for 03/28/06, Talk:Reverend Gary Davis#GA review, and Talk:Jamaica College#Re-assessment 5. Thanks! NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nom, looks like a better target. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 12:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or at worst Disambiguate due to a significant amount of incoming links (150+) which seem to overwhelmingly intended to target the peerage wikiproject. From a spot check mislinks seem to be only a small portion of current uses. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget Its a low link count, but since its been around since 2006, I might suggest a hat? Although there are so many hats already over there. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Horse racer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to jockey. Consensus is against the original target (the snake); initially horse racing was suggested, but when jockey was suggested, everyone else supported it. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This term can also be used in reference to horse racing. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to horse racing and add hatnote pointing to the snake article --Lenticel (talk) 01:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget with hatnote as Lenticel suggested, sounds like the best solution. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 12:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Same as above except that retarget to Jockey as the more appropriate target. Jay (talk) 02:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Jockey as the article which discusses people who race horses. feminist (talk) | never forget 07:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two potential targets are currently being discussed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget w/hat I agree that Jockey is a better target. The Redirect is horse racer. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grec ancien[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 14#Grec ancien

Loop Line ((Seoul Metropolitan Subway))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More redirects with malformed double bracket disambiguators, delete all per WP:UNNATURAL. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 18:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all - Appears to be no real reason to keep any of these. I concur completely. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. BD2412 T 22:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dave Cummings ((pornographic actor))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yet more redirects with malformed double bracketed disambiguators, delete per WP:UNNATURAL 192.76.8.78 (talk) 18:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:A[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 19:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current target is not commonly viewed. According to this, it gets an average of 9 views a day. Meanwhile, the administrators page receives a much larger 434 per day. That is 48 times the current target. I propose a retarget to WP:ADMIN. interstatefive  17:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as is. This redirect has 6500 incoming links, almost all of which appear to be intending to point to the page on attribution. Ancient project space redirects with significant usage should not be changed without very good reason. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 17:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Leave alone per IP. WP:RKEEP #4, created in '04 with many links. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thessaloniki massacres (1821))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yet more redirects with double closing brackets, delete all per WP:UNNATURAL. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 17:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. BD2412 T 22:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but please note, one of these, Deep Depression ARB 03 (2011)), actually had a link within an article. I have now corrected the link to just a single paren and created the correct redirect. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tianhe Stadium (Guangzhou (Canton))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this is a useful redirect. I don't see the need for the double disambiguation, I don't see how it makes sense to disambiguate the name of a city with a different form of the name of the city and I don't think that "disambiguator in a disambiguator" type constructions are likely to be linked to or searched for. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

R&B and Soul music[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XY These redirects combine together Rhythm and blues and Soul music so it is unclear which one they should target. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 17:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – it isn't needed. We have a dab for Rhythm and blues, and a dab for Soul music. Atsme 💬 📧 17:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Atsme. BD2412 T 05:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

R et B[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE. No specific affinity between Rhythm and blues and French/latin 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I have no clear idea from which language the "et" is supposed to be from (French? Can it be a play on word with Roland Barthes ?). Veverve (talk) 17:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per et, I have found that "et" means "and" in Franco-Provençal, French, archaic forms of Italian, Latin, Middle French, Norman (Jèrriais), Old French, Picard, and Walloon. Of those, only Franco-Provençal, French, Jèrriais, Picard, and Walloon are both still spoken widely and use et in regular parlance. Interestingly, in French and most of the other languages it seems as if Rhythm and Blue despite being spelled Rhythm & Blue implying a pronunciation of Rhythm et Blues is generally pronounced as Rhythm-n-Blues to match it with the English sound. Regardless, I could find little-to-nothing in any of these languages using this term so not only is an RLOTE, it's seemingly a neologism as well. TartarTorte 19:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This simply isn't helpful, and thus it isn't worth keeping. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Useless as this term does not exist in English nor any language for the matter, if Torte is correct. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bône ((département)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yet more redirects with misspelled/broken double braket disamiguators. Delete per WP:UNNATURAL. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete but we really need a CSD for these misbracketed disambiguations; nominating all these must get pretty tiring if you have to do it every single time you run into these! — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. BD2412 T 22:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marcia (wife of Marcus Ulpius Traianus (senator))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term because it forms a wikipedia self reference, you need to know how wikipedia would disambiguate Marcus Ulpius Traianus for this to make any sense. Furthermore this "disambiguator in a disambiguator" construction is unlikley to be arrived at by searchers (WP:UNNATURAL) 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: The disambiguator within a disambiguator does not make sense here either. If Trajan (the target of Marcus Ulpius Traianus also had a wife named Marcia, then I could see the logic in it, but he was married to Pompeia Plotina and even her full name of Pompeia Plotina Claudia Phoebe Piso does not contain Marcia. TartarTorte 19:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. BD2412 T 22:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete We shouldn't have redirects with double disambiguators. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:20, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Hannah Montana episodes (Season 3))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another batch of redirects with malformed, double closed bracket disambigators. Delete all per WP:UNNATURAL. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. BD2412 T 22:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as implausible. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mick Lyons (footballer (soccer))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term. "Soccer" is not a disambiguator for "football" and the disambiguaror in a disambiguator construction is highly unlikely to be searched for (WP:UNNATURAL). Left over from reverting a 2007 era page move. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. BD2412 T 22:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Call (comic book series))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another batch of redirects with malformed disamiguators with doubled closing brackets. Delete per WP:UNNATURAL. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 14:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. MB 15:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. BD2412 T 22:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as implausible. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Soul/R&B Music[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XY. This redirect combines two genres of music together and as such it is unclear which one it should target, it could point to Rhythm and blues or Soul music. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 14:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unhelpful ambiguous combo redirect. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Independent journalism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if these two terms are synonymous. To add confusion to the mix, Independent journalist redirects to Freelancer. I suggest both of these should be redlinked to encourage article creation, unless there is an obvious redirect or disambiguation page I'm missing. QueenofBithynia (talk) 10:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The most remarkable formula in mathematics[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 15#The most remarkable formula in mathematics

Czechoslovak[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move DAB to title. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 21:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Divert to Czechoslovakia: The word "Czechoslovak" is a demonym for the erstwhile country. Please also see the Astronaut page where "Czechoslovak" is used to describe a person from Czechoslovakia. Thank you. NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support the ideal retarget would either be Czechoslovakia or Czechoslovak (disambiguation). Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 22:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to DAB Struck - see below thank you 192..78 Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@IAmChaos If you agree that this title should lead to the disambiguation page then the DAB page should be moved here. When you have a redirect at "Foo" pointing to "Foo (disambiguation)" you have what is called a WP:MALPLACED disambiguation page. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 17:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you. I guess my !-v is Move DAB Happy Editing--IAmChaos 17:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget to Czechoslovakia or move Czechoslovak (disambiguation) to this title?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) | never forget 07:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

MacOS Mammoth[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:20, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This was originally a page created before Apple announced macOS Ventura, under the presumption that some rumors that Apple would call the next release "macOS Mammoth" were true. The rumors turned out to be false. At some point Apple might release a "macOS Mammoth", at which point the page will become a page for that release rather than a redirect to another release. (Note that, when it was the aforementioned article, rather than a redirect, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacOS Mammoth was created, and the result of the discussion was "delete"; it might have been deleted and then replaced with a draft article that also mis-guessed the release name.) Guy Harris (talk) 05:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Noting that I declined A10 here because I felt there was a colorable argument that this is a valid {{r from incorrect name}}. That's not to say I definitely think it is one, just that I felt discussion was merited. I'm currently neutral. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of members of the Nebraska Legislature[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 07:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vague target; the Nebraska Senate only became the sole chamber in 1938. For members of the defunct Nebraska House, we have Category:Members of the Nebraska House of Representatives; in any case, redirect title doesn't apply cleanly or solely to target. Iseult Δx parlez moi 04:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and add hatnote. The Nebraska Legislature is currently synonymous with Nebraska Senate. Since we don't have any article on members of the bicameral legislature, there's no ambiguity to resolve here. But we can add {{for|all legislators since 1867|Category:Members of the Nebraska House of Representatives|Category:Nebraska state senators}}, which can be turned into a link to a List of members of the Nebraska Legislature (1867–1934), if such a list is written. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 06:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and add hatnote per above - I think there's useful distinguishing information, and it's possible to convert the redirect into an article. I'll just add that I've been thinking of creating that list, but there is a lot of research to do for that peculiar time in Nebraska history ;). Urve (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and add Tamzin's hat. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Add "See Also" section to the Senators page. This way, all Senators are in a page while all Reps are in another page. Moreover, although I typically support self-refs, the Category is a poor choice for it because of its relatively low navigability. NotReallySoroka (talk) 04:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mr. Beast[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 15#Mr. Beast

Empire Air Training Scheme[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to British Commonwealth Air Training Plan. signed, Rosguill talk 19:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be retargeted to British Commonwealth Air Training Plan, of which this was an alternative name? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The redirect was pointing to the suggested target for some 13 years until SamHolt6 retargeted it to the current one, around the time he was working on both targets. Jay (talk) 09:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_7&oldid=1154197588"